Mark Payne

617 citations
24 papers · 377 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Payne

24 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers

Mark Payne
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Linguistics and Language 73
  • Archeology 83
  • Language and Linguistics 81
  • Literature and Literary Theory 78
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 66
Replace Christopher S. Butler with:
Christopher S. Butler United Kingdom
John L. Hayes United States
Barrett United States
Mariam Attia United Kingdom
Keiko Tsuchiya Japan
Jeffrey Walker United States
Kathryn Hibbert Canada
H.J.M. Venbrux Netherlands
Christine Couture France
Fuensanta Monroy Hernández Spain
Mark Payne relative to Christopher S. Butler United Kingdom Christopher S. Butler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×41.5×
Christopher S. Butler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Payne. The network helps show where Mark Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mark Payne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Payne Line = papers co-authored together Mark Payne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201757
2 201649
3 200643
4 200637
5 201034
6 201928
7 201417
8 202013
9 200713
10 200611
11 20119
12 20169
13 20078
14 20198
15 20197
16 20195
17 20225
18 20195
19 20055
20 20125

About Mark Payne

Mark Payne is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multilingual Education and Policy (10 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (8 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (7 papers), Romani and Gypsy Studies (5 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (4 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (4 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 papers) and Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (73 citations), Archeology (83 citations), Language and Linguistics (81 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (78 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (66 citations). Mark Payne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Williams, Jason M. Warnett, Valerie Hobbs, Brian Burnett, Nicholas Hunt, Mariano Tommasi, Ernesto Stein, Eduardo Lora, Richard Feinberg and M Painter. Their work appears in journals such as Current Issues in Language Planning, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science International, Linguistics and Education and Language Problems & Language Planning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact