Mark P. Carpenter
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Francis NarinJ. Davidson FrameMartin Cooper
- Topics
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research (8 papers)Academic Publishing and Open Access (4 papers)Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyManagement of Technology and InnovationStrategy and Management
- Journals
- IEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementSocial Studies of ScienceWorld Patent Information
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark P. Carpenter
12 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 493
- Economics and Econometrics 423
- Management of Technology and Innovation 412
- Strategy and Management 256
- Information Systems 160
Countries citing papers authored by Mark P. Carpenter
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark P. Carpenter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark P. Carpenter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark P. Carpenter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark P. Carpenter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark P. Carpenter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark P. Carpenter. The network helps show where Mark P. Carpenter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark P. Carpenter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark P. Carpenter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark P. Carpenter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark P. Carpenter. Mark P. Carpenter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 76 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 98 | |
| 4 | 64 | |
| 5 | 258 | |
| 6 | 123 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 262 | |
| 9 | 86 | |
| 10 | 56 | |
| 11 | 97 | |
| 12 | 113 |
About Mark P. Carpenter
Mark P. Carpenter is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems and Management and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (8 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (4 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (493 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (412 citations) and Strategy and Management (256 citations). Mark P. Carpenter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis Narin, J. Davidson Frame and Martin Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Social Studies of Science and World Patent Information.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.