Mark O’Neil-Johnson
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Biotechnology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 8
-
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents 3
- Co-authors
- Courtney M. StarksGary R. EldridgeMatt G. GoeringJin‐Feng HuRussell B. WilliamsEliane GaroHye‐Dong YooGrayson Hough
- Journals
- Journal of Natural Products (9 papers)Phytochemistry (5 papers)Planta Medica (5 papers)The Plant Journal (3 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Mark O’Neil-Johnson
45 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Pharmacology 243
- Biotechnology 98
- Biochemistry 76
- Pharmacology 91
- Molecular Biology 683
Countries citing papers authored by Mark O’Neil-Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark O’Neil-Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark O’Neil-Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark O’Neil-Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark O’Neil-Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark O’Neil-Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark O’Neil-Johnson. The network helps show where Mark O’Neil-Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark O’Neil-Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 73 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 61 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 48 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 27 |
About Mark O’Neil-Johnson
Mark O’Neil-Johnson is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Toxicology, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (19 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (10 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (8 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (8 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (8 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (4 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (243 citations), Biotechnology (98 citations), Biochemistry (76 citations), Pharmacology (91 citations) and Molecular Biology (683 citations). Mark O’Neil-Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Courtney M. Starks, Gary R. Eldridge, Matt G. Goering, Jin‐Feng Hu, Russell B. Williams, Eliane Garo, Hye‐Dong Yoo, Grayson Hough, Peadar Cremin and Megan M. Augustin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Phytochemistry, Planta Medica, The Plant Journal and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.