Mark Li‐cheng Wu
- Genetics top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Surgery
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Chung‐I WuCharles F. AquadroHope HollocherEugene Yujun XuDavid J BegunEric L. CabotSarah DryKlaus J. Lewin
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers)Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (6 papers)Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGenetics
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
Mark Li‐cheng Wu
39 papers receiving 524 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Genetics 186
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 139
- Surgery 130
- Oncology 121
- Molecular Biology 101
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Li‐cheng Wu
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Li‐cheng Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Li‐cheng Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Li‐cheng Wu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Li‐cheng Wu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Li‐cheng Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Li‐cheng Wu. The network helps show where Mark Li‐cheng Wu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Li‐cheng Wu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Li‐cheng Wu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Li‐cheng Wu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Li‐cheng Wu. Mark Li‐cheng Wu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Sporadic Visceral Myopathy: Full Thickness Rectal Biopsy to Clinch the Diagnosis | 2 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Mark Li‐cheng Wu
Mark Li‐cheng Wu is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (6 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (139 citations), Genetics (186 citations) and Insect Science (64 citations). Mark Li‐cheng Wu has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Chung‐I Wu, Charles F. Aquadro, Hope Hollocher, Eugene Yujun Xu, David J Begun, Eric L. Cabot, Sarah Dry, Klaus J. Lewin, Parul Doshi and Charles Lassman. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.