Mark L. Dantzker

24 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Mark L. Dantzker
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Sociology and Political Science 206
  • Political Science and International Relations 176
  • Gender Studies 78
  • Clinical Psychology 63
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 61
Replace Robert G. Culbertson with:
Robert G. Culbertson United States
Sarah Charman United Kingdom
Ruohui Zhao Macao
Michael A. Caldero United States
Hyunin Baek United States
Weston J. Morrow United States
Amy J. Stichman United States
Nicholas Alex United States
Frank J. Weed United States
Knud Knudsen Norway
Mark L. Dantzker relative to Robert G. Culbertson United States Robert G. Culbertson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert G. Culbertson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark L. Dantzker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark L. Dantzker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark L. Dantzker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark L. Dantzker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark L. Dantzker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark L. Dantzker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark L. Dantzker. The network helps show where Mark L. Dantzker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark L. Dantzker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark L. Dantzker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark L. Dantzker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark L. Dantzker. Mark L. Dantzker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 36
3 8
4 3
5 2
6 17
7
Community Policing: Then and Now
1
8
Possible Conflict in Human Sexuality Attitudes Between Males and Females at a Hispanic-Serving University: Factor Analysis of Sexual Attitudes
0
9 7
10 6
11 9
12
Contemporary Police Organization and Management Issues and Trends
6
13
Readings for research methods in criminology and criminal justice
8
14 69
15
Criminology and Criminal Justice: Comparing, Contrasting, and Intertwining Disciplines
13
16 22
17 25
18
Understanding today's police
22
19 14
20 6

About Mark L. Dantzker

Mark L. Dantzker is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (12 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (78 citations), Political Science and International Relations (176 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (61 citations). Mark L. Dantzker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Russell Eisenman, Lee Ellis, William G. Doerner and Lorie A. Fridell. Their work appears in journals such as Professional Psychology Research and Practice, The Journal of General Psychology and American Journal of Criminal Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026