Mark Goodman

27 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers

Mark Goodman
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Music 8
  • Clinical Psychology 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 33
  • Communication 14
  • Literature and Literary Theory 12
Replace Simone Arbour with:
Simone Arbour Canada
Jennifer Tsai United States
Subash Kumar Pillai Malaysia
Dianne Watkins United Kingdom
Julia A. Martinez United States
Andre Mason New Zealand
Joseph A. Mienko United States
Jacqueline Hogue Canada
Sharon McDonough Australia
Javier Rizo United States
Mark Goodman relative to Simone Arbour Canada Simone Arbour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Simone Arbour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Goodman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Goodman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Goodman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Goodman. The network helps show where Mark Goodman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Mark Goodman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Goodman Line = papers co-authored together Mark Goodman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Eveningness predicts academic procrastination: The mediating role of neuroticism.
200059
2 200917
3 201214
4 200910
5 20068
6 20057
7 20077
8
Stemming the Tide: The Presentation of Women Scientists in CSI
20166
9 20084
10 20004
11 20033
12
Real Emotional Logic: Film and Television Docudrama as Persuasive Practice
20062
13 20092
14 20172
15 20002
16 19762
17 19972
18
Facing a Double-Edged Sword.
19961
19 20171
20 20121

About Mark Goodman

Mark Goodman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Communication, Music and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 32 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers), Music History and Culture (4 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers), Media Studies and Communication (2 papers) and Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (8 citations), Clinical Psychology (54 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (33 citations), Communication (14 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (12 citations). Mark Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian Hess, Martin F. Sherman, Haideh Moghissi, Piotr S. Bobkowski, Thomas P. Guck, William B. Jeffries, Robert M. Coleman, Christopher J. Destache, Pete Smith and Michelle Banfield. Their work appears in journals such as Media Watch, Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Diabetic Medicine, Journal of Learning Disabilities and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact