Mark F. Schwartz

54 total papers · 1.2k total citations
36 papers, 869 citations indexed

About

Mark F. Schwartz is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark F. Schwartz has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 869 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Mark F. Schwartz's work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers). Mark F. Schwartz is often cited by papers focused on Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers). Mark F. Schwartz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Colombia. Mark F. Schwartz's co-authors include Alice M. Isen, John Money, Margaret S. Clark, Stephen Southern, William H. Masters, John R. Graham, Catherine M. Roe, Robert C. Kolodny, Margaret Clark and Steven C. Abell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Mark F. Schwartz

34 papers receiving 709 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Mark F. Schwartz	450	264	210	171	135	36	869
Madison Aitken	436 1.0×	420 1.6×	88 0.4×	148 0.9×	88 0.7×	37	856
Anthony P. Thompson	434 1.0×	193 0.7×	373 1.8×	62 0.4×	69 0.5×	62	988
Friedemann Pfäfflin	463 1.0×	611 2.3×	196 0.9×	173 1.0×	131 1.0×	54	924
Jiska Ristori	319 0.7×	644 2.4×	101 0.5×	205 1.2×	174 1.3×	40	913
Katherine B. Starzyk	261 0.6×	268 1.0×	273 1.3×	41 0.2×	23 0.2×	30	714
Phyllis W. Berman	219 0.5×	169 0.6×	131 0.6×	101 0.6×	42 0.3×	45	786
Lisa Dawn Hamilton	395 0.9×	309 1.2×	191 0.9×	100 0.6×	21 0.2×	28	964
Catherine Butler	359 0.8×	336 1.3×	241 1.1×	88 0.5×	172 1.3×	64	961
Melissa Ames	389 0.9×	158 0.6×	260 1.2×	146 0.9×	79 0.6×	15	778
David McCord	310 0.7×	236 0.9×	164 0.8×	38 0.2×	11 0.1×	65	868

Countries citing papers authored by Mark F. Schwartz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark F. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark F. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark F. Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark F. Schwartz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark F. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark F. Schwartz. The network helps show where Mark F. Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark F. Schwartz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark F. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark F. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark F. Schwartz. Mark F. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact