Mark Edwin

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 853 citations indexed

About

Mark Edwin is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Edwin has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 853 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 2 papers in Genetics and 1 paper in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Mark Edwin's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (1 paper). Mark Edwin is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (1 paper). Mark Edwin collaborates with scholars based in United States and China. Mark Edwin's co-authors include Jay H. Ryu, Darrell R. Schroeder, Kenneth P. Offord, Henry D. Tazelaar, Jeffrey L. Myers, Manjushree Gautam, James A. Wilkens, Mauricio Orrego, James W. Williams and Hugo E. Vargas and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Neuro-Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Mark Edwin

7 papers receiving 821 citations

Hit Papers

Prognostic Significance of Histopathologic Subsets in Idi... 1998 2026 2007 2016 1998 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Edwin United States 4 777 244 104 74 68 7 853
Helen E. Jo Australia 13 577 0.7× 240 1.0× 55 0.5× 54 0.7× 36 0.5× 31 606
Carlos Aravena Chile 12 689 0.9× 293 1.2× 40 0.4× 109 1.5× 115 1.7× 28 796
Judit Axmann United Kingdom 6 566 0.7× 252 1.0× 75 0.7× 53 0.7× 15 0.2× 11 594
Olivia Freynet France 11 393 0.5× 229 0.9× 67 0.6× 24 0.3× 41 0.6× 28 459
Konstantinos Kagouridis Greece 11 443 0.6× 118 0.5× 70 0.7× 28 0.4× 56 0.8× 19 485
Kaïs Ahmad France 7 344 0.4× 131 0.5× 97 0.9× 40 0.5× 25 0.4× 15 413
Cathryn Lee United States 9 657 0.8× 230 0.9× 176 1.7× 56 0.8× 20 0.3× 13 700
Laurens De Sadeleer Belgium 12 318 0.4× 135 0.6× 51 0.5× 78 1.1× 61 0.9× 32 406
Ada Vancheri Italy 12 308 0.4× 108 0.4× 91 0.9× 16 0.2× 26 0.4× 26 372
Pranav K. Vyas United States 8 209 0.3× 215 0.9× 71 0.7× 28 0.4× 68 1.0× 16 374

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Edwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Edwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Edwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Edwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Edwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Edwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Edwin. The network helps show where Mark Edwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Edwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Edwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Edwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Edwin. Mark Edwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Sharma, Akanksha, Briant Fruth, Maciej Mrugala, et al.. (2021). How much time do we have? Longitudinal perception of prognosis in newly-diagnosed high grade glioma patients and caregivers compared to clinicians. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 152(2). 313–323. 15 indexed citations
2.
Sharma, Akanksha, Eric Wolfe, Samantha Williamson, et al.. (2020). Longitudinal Perception of Prognosis of Patients with High Grade Glioma Compared to their Caregivers and Clinicians (2588). Neurology. 94(15_supplement). 1 indexed citations
3.
Meltzer, Ellen C., Natalia S. Ivascu, Mark Edwin, & Timothy J. Ingall. (2019). Should Long-Term Life-Sustaining Care Be Started in Emergency Settings?. The AMA Journal of Ethic. 21(5). E401–406. 3 indexed citations
4.
Sharma, Akanksha, Eric Wolfe, Samantha Williamson, et al.. (2019). QOLP-07. A PILOT STUDY TO ASSESS THE INTEGRATION OF A UNIQUE PROQOL TOOL AND EARLY PALLIATIVE CARE INTERVENTION IN THE CARE OF HIGH GRADE GLIOMA PATIENTS AND THEIR CAREGIVERS. Neuro-Oncology. 21(Supplement_6). vi198–vi199. 2 indexed citations
5.
Sharma, Akanksha, Eric Wolfe, Samantha Williamson, et al.. (2019). QOLP-15. LONGITUDINAL PERCEPTION OF PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH GRADE GLIOMA COMPARED TO THEIR CAREGIVERS AND CLINICIANS. Neuro-Oncology. 21(Supplement_6). vi200–vi201. 1 indexed citations
6.
Cheruvattath, Rekha, Mauricio Orrego, Manjushree Gautam, et al.. (2006). Vitamin A toxicity: When one a day doesn't keep the doctor away. Liver Transplantation. 12(12). 1888–1891. 35 indexed citations
7.
Ryu, Jay H., Mark Edwin, Jeffrey L. Myers, et al.. (1998). Prognostic Significance of Histopathologic Subsets in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 157(1). 199–203. 796 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026