James W. Williams
Impact in
- Transplantation top 0.5%
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Hepatology top 1%
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
Papers in
-
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 20
- Hepatology 19
- Liver Disease and Transplantation 14
- Co-authors
- Anita S. ChongPreston FosterHoward SankaryAlison FinneganJikun ShenXiulong XuEric G. BremerLawrence McChesney
- Journals
- Transplantation (42 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (3 papers)The Journal of Immunology (3 papers)Hepatology (3 papers)Liver Transplantation (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaJapan
In The Last Decade
James W. Williams
105 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Transplantation 653
- Hepatology 765
- Oncology 929
- Surgery 1.4k
- Epidemiology 919
Countries citing papers authored by James W. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Williams. The network helps show where James W. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James W. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 155 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 28 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 171 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 43 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 66 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 187 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 37 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 30 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 51 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 9 |
About James W. Williams
James W. Williams is a scholar working on Transplantation, Hepatology, Surgery, Immunology and Epidemiology, having authored 107 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (28 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (20 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (14 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (12 papers), Xenotransplantation and immune response (12 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (8 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (653 citations), Hepatology (765 citations), Oncology (929 citations), Surgery (1.4k citations) and Epidemiology (919 citations). James W. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Anita S. Chong, Preston Foster, Howard Sankary, Alison Finnegan, Jikun Shen, Xiulong Xu, Eric G. Bremer, Lawrence McChesney, Leonard Blinder and Karyn F. Siemasko. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, The American Journal of Surgery, The Journal of Immunology, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.