Deanna Marcum
- Information Systems top 10%
- Library and Information Sciences top 2%
- Conservation top 5%
- Information Systems and Management
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Topics
- Digital and Traditional Archives Management (8 papers)Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (8 papers)Web and Library Services (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Deanna Marcum
28 papers receiving 132 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Information Systems 97
- Library and Information Sciences 39
- Conservation 35
- Information Systems and Management 25
- Literature and Literary Theory 25
Countries citing papers authored by Deanna Marcum
This map shows the geographic impact of Deanna Marcum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deanna Marcum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deanna Marcum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deanna Marcum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deanna Marcum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deanna Marcum. The network helps show where Deanna Marcum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deanna Marcum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deanna Marcum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deanna Marcum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deanna Marcum. Deanna Marcum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Office of Scholarly Communication scope, organizational placement, and planning in ten research libraries | 4 |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | The Data Deluge: Can Libraries Cope with E-Science? | 11 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Digital Library Development: The View from Kanazawa | 2 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Research Questions for the Digital Era Library | 14 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Defining "common good" in the digital world | 2 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | Literacy: The Library Legend. | 2 |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | Preservation Education Institute Final Report (Queenstown, Maryland, August 2-4, 1990). | 1 |
About Deanna Marcum
Deanna Marcum is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Conservation and Museology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital and Traditional Archives Management (8 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (8 papers) and Web and Library Services (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (39 citations), Conservation (35 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (7 citations). Deanna Marcum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald George, Roger Schonfeld, Sarah Thomas, Lorcan Dempsey and James G. Neal. Their work appears in journals such as Information Processing & Management, First Monday and The Journal of Academic Librarianship.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.