Mark Eccles

460 citations
17 papers · 79 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis

Papers in

    • Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 1
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 1

Mark Eccles

12 papers receiving 36 citations

Peers

Mark Eccles
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Classics 17
  • Literature and Literary Theory 23
  • History 20
  • Anthropology 9
  • Museology 3
Replace Giovanni Aquilecchia with:
Giovanni Aquilecchia Mexico
Jacques Monfrin
Cesare Vasoli Italy
B. L. Ullman United States
Dilwyn Knox
Wilhelm Schmidt‐Biggemann Germany
Richard Hunt United Kingdom
Stephen Clucas United Kingdom
Carl Nordenfalk Germany
F. Edward Cranz United States
Mark Eccles relative to Giovanni Aquilecchia Mexico Giovanni Aquilecchia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Giovanni Aquilecchia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Eccles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Eccles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Eccles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Eccles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Eccles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Eccles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Eccles. The network helps show where Mark Eccles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Mark Eccles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Eccles Line = papers co-authored together Mark Eccles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 198423
2 196212
3
Low light level detectors in astronomy
198311
4 19855
5 19574
6 19824
7 19934
8 19854
9 19743
10
English Renaissance drama : essays in honor of Madeleine Doran & Mark Eccles
19762
11 19882
12 19901
13 19841
14 19851
15 19821
16 19711
17 19800

About Mark Eccles

Mark Eccles is a scholar working on Classics, History, Literature and Literary Theory, Oceanography and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 79 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1 paper), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (1 paper), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (1 paper), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (1 paper) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (17 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (23 citations), History (20 citations), Anthropology (9 citations) and Museology (3 citations). Mark Eccles has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Lesotho and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. L. Rowse and Richard Knowles. Their work appears in journals such as Notes and Queries, Shakespeare Quarterly, Comparative drama, English Literary Renaissance and The Modern Language Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026