This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Moore more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Moore. The network helps show where Mark E. Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Moore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Moore.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Moore based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Moore. Mark E. Moore is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moore, Mark E., et al.. (2017). Brand name ethics as a marketing concern: a narrative inquiry of the Washington Redskins’ debate. Innovative Marketing. 10(4).
2.
Baldridge, David, et al.. (2016). People with Disabilities. Oxford University Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
Rowe, William J., et al.. (2013). Three-tiered sponsorship: a study of decision heuristics across multiple levels of sport sponsorship. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Moore, Mark E., et al.. (2011). The marketing revolution of Tim Tebow: a celebrity endorsement case study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
Graybeal, Benjamin A., Brent Phares, Dennis D. Rolander, Mark E. Moore, & Glenn Washer. (2002). Visual Inspection of Highway Bridges. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation. 21(3). 67–83.146 indexed citations
12.
Rolander, Dennis D., Brent Phares, Benjamin A. Graybeal, Mark E. Moore, & Glenn Washer. (2001). Highway Bridge Inspection: State-of-the-Practice Survey. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1749(1). 73–81.45 indexed citations
13.
Phares, Brent, Benjamin A. Graybeal, Dennis D. Rolander, Mark E. Moore, & Glenn Washer. (2001). Reliability and Accuracy of Routine Inspection of Highway Bridges. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1749(1). 82–92.18 indexed citations
14.
Graybeal, Benjamin A., Dennis D. Rolander, Brent Phares, Mark E. Moore, & Glenn Washer. (2001). Reliability and Accuracy of In-Depth Inspection of Highway Bridges. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1749(1). 93–99.9 indexed citations
Moore, Mark E.. (1994). AISI-FHWA Model Bridge Test. 1065–1070.1 indexed citations
17.
Moore, Mark E., et al.. (1990). WHEEL-LOAD DISTRIBUTION RESULTS FROM AISI-FHWA MODEL BRIDGE STUDY. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.4 indexed citations
Moore, Mark E. & Ivan M. Viest. (1988). Laboratory Tests of a Continuous Composite Bridge. 472–486.2 indexed citations
20.
Moore, Mark E.. (1987). The relationship of situational attributes and management style to the success of marketing intercollegiate football programs. UMI eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.