David Fredrick
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Archeology top 5%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Papers in
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 3
-
- Augmented Reality Applications 2
- Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction 1
- Co-authors
- Richard J. Golsan (1 shared paper)Steven M. Oberhelman (1 shared paper)John M. Gauch (1 shared paper)Davide Tanasi (1 shared paper)Nick J. Reynolds (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Arethusa (3 papers)Classical Antiquity (1 paper)Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences (1 paper)AI & Society (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Fredrick
11 papers receiving 71 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Anthropology 61
- Archeology 37
- Classics 11
- Religious studies 12
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 8
Countries citing papers authored by David Fredrick
This map shows the geographic impact of David Fredrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Fredrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Fredrick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Fredrick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Fredrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Fredrick. The network helps show where David Fredrick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside David Fredrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Roman gaze : vision, power, and the body | 2002 | 38 |
| 2 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 0 |
About David Fredrick
David Fredrick is a scholar working on Anthropology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 13 papers that have together received 108 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (1 paper), Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (1 paper), Urban Design and Spatial Analysis (1 paper) and Problem and Project Based Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (61 citations), Archeology (37 citations), Classics (11 citations), Religious studies (12 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (8 citations). David Fredrick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Golsan, Steven M. Oberhelman, John M. Gauch, Davide Tanasi and Nick J. Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as Arethusa, Classical Antiquity, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, AI & Society and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.