Mark Costanzo
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 2%
- Co-authors
- Dane ArcherStuart OskampElliot AronsonThomas F. PettigrewMartin M. ChemersMarti Hope GonzalesEllen GerrityStella M. Nkomo
- Topics
- Deception detection and forensic psychology (8 papers)Jury Decision Making Processes (7 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Costanzo
32 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Sociology and Political Science 606
- Social Psychology 454
- Gender Studies 276
- Clinical Psychology 254
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 229
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Costanzo
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Costanzo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Costanzo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Costanzo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Costanzo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Costanzo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Costanzo. The network helps show where Mark Costanzo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Costanzo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Costanzo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Costanzo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Costanzo. Mark Costanzo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | Psychological and cultural aspects of interrogations and false confessions: Using research to inform legal decision-making. | 15 |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | Psychology Applied to Law | 16 |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 85 | |
| 10 | 82 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | Gender issues in contemporary society | 243 |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 199 | |
| 17 | 99 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 248 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Mark Costanzo
Mark Costanzo is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Law and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (8 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (7 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (276 citations), Social Psychology (454 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (229 citations). Mark Costanzo has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dane Archer, Stuart Oskamp, Elliot Aronson, Thomas F. Pettigrew, Martin M. Chemers, Marti Hope Gonzales, Ellen Gerrity, Stella M. Nkomo, Heather J. Smith and M. Brinton Lykes. Their work appears in journals such as Administrative Science Quarterly, American Psychologist and Journal of Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.