Mark C. Tebbitt

34 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

Mark C. Tebbitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 372
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 55
  • Plant Science 166
  • Molecular Biology 289
  • Ecological Modeling 15
Replace Jess A. Peirson with:
Jess A. Peirson United States
Jeffrey P. Rose United States
Akiyo Naiki Japan
Enriquena Bustamante Mexico
Michaela Sonnleitner Austria
Patricio Novoa Chile
Jaime Güemes Spain
Martin Čertner Czechia
Jéferson Nunes Fregonezi Brazil
Murray J. Henwood Australia
Mark C. Tebbitt relative to Jess A. Peirson United States Jess A. Peirson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jess A. Peirson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Tebbitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Tebbitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Tebbitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Tebbitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Tebbitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Tebbitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Tebbitt. The network helps show where Mark C. Tebbitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Tebbitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark C. Tebbitt Line = papers co-authored together Mark C. Tebbitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200189
2 200473
3 200261
4 201535
5 200629
6 200318
7 199814
8 199910
9 20029
10 20038
11 20167
12 20156
13 20055
14 20055
15 20005
16 20154
17 20114
18 20174
19 20163
20 20153

About Mark C. Tebbitt

Mark C. Tebbitt is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (34 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (33 papers), Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (13 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (2 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (2 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (372 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (55 citations), Plant Science (166 citations), Molecular Biology (289 citations) and Ecological Modeling (15 citations). Mark C. Tebbitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Hollingsworth, J. Squirrell, Richard M. Bateman, Laura L. Forrest, Susan M. Swensen, Wendy L. Clement, James H. Dickson, M. A. MacConaill, Michelle L. Hollingsworth and Torsten Eriksson. Their work appears in journals such as Phytotaxa, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, American Journal of Botany, Edinburgh Journal of Botany and Molecular Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact