Mark Bonta

25 papers receiving 213 citations

Peers

Mark Bonta
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Ecological Modeling 31
  • Geography, Planning and Development 26
  • Horticulture 4
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 68
  • Ecology 62
Replace F. S. Wyndham with:
F. S. Wyndham United States
Hirokazu Yasuoka Japan
Jeffrey B. Luzar United States
Shafqat Hussain United States
Abdul Haris Mustari Indonesia
Izaias Brasil da Silva Brazil
Hēmi Whaanga New Zealand
Ricardo Falla New Zealand
David Quammen United States
Nora Bynum United States
Mark Bonta relative to F. S. Wyndham United States F. S. Wyndham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
F. S. Wyndham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bonta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bonta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bonta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bonta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bonta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bonta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bonta. The network helps show where Mark Bonta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark Bonta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Bonta Line = papers co-authored together Mark Bonta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201764
2 200426
3 201919
4 201015
5 201114
6 201912
7 200611
8 201210
9 20049
10
Birding Honduras : a checklist and guide
20039
11
VALORIZING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PEOPLE AND BIRDS: EXPERIENCES AND LESSONS FROM HONDURAS
20087
12 20185
13 20125
14 20114
15 20074
16 20184
17 20074
18 20073
19 20093
20 20123

About Mark Bonta

Mark Bonta is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Anthropology and Cultural Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean (10 papers), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (6 papers), Plant and soil sciences (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (3 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers) and Latin American and Latino Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (31 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations), Horticulture (4 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (68 citations) and Ecology (62 citations). Mark Bonta has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include John Protevi, J. L. Haynes, María Teresa Pulido Silva, Daniel A. Graham, Andrew P. Vovides, Angélica Cibrián‐Jaramillo, Laura Yáñez‐Espinosa, Spencer G. Lucas, Guillermo E. Alvarado and Juan Antonio Reyes‐Agüero. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnobiology, GeoJournal, Society & Natural Resources, Geographical Review and Geoforum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026