Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels
2008429 citationsMario Callegaro, Charles DiSograPublic Opinion Quarterlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mario Callegaro
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mario Callegaro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mario Callegaro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mario Callegaro more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mario Callegaro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mario Callegaro. The network helps show where Mario Callegaro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mario Callegaro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mario Callegaro.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mario Callegaro based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mario Callegaro. Mario Callegaro is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Callegaro, Mario, et al.. (2019). “Big Data Meets Survey Science”. Social Science Computer Review. 39(4). 484–488.8 indexed citations
2.
Callegaro, Mario, et al.. (2017). ESOMAR/GRBN Guideline on Mobile Research.1 indexed citations
3.
Callegaro, Mario, et al.. (2015). Panel Conditioning and Attrition in the AP-Yahoo! News Election Panel Study.9 indexed citations
Link, Michael, Joe Murphy, Michael F. Schober, et al.. (2014). Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys.7 indexed citations
9.
Murphy, Joe, Michael Link, Casey Langer Tesfaye, et al.. (2014). Social media in public opinion research: Report of the AAPOR task force on emerging technologies in public opinion research.31 indexed citations
Callegaro, Mario & Giancarlo Gasperoni. (2009). Accuracy of Pre-Election Polls for the 2006 Italian Parliamentary Election: Too Close to Call. SSRN Electronic Journal.
14.
Zhang, Chan, Mario Callegaro, Melanie Thomas, & Charles DiSogra. (2009). Do We Hear Different Voices?: Investigating the Differences Between Internet and non-Internet Users On Attitudes and Behaviors.2 indexed citations
15.
Callegaro, Mario. (2008). Seam effects in longitudinal surveys. Journal of Official Statistics. 24(3). 387–409.13 indexed citations
16.
Callegaro, Mario & Charles DiSogra. (2008). Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Callegaro, Mario & Charles DiSogra. (2008). Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels. Public Opinion Quarterly. 72(5). 1008–1032.429 indexed citations breakdown →
Callegaro, Mario. (2007). Seam effects changes due to modifications in question wording and data collection strategies: A comparison of conventional questionnaire and event history calendar seam effects in the PSID. Insecta mundi.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.