Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial
2010677 citationsJohn E. Mottershead, Michael Link et al.profile →
Analysis of video transmission over lossy channels
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Link's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Link with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Link more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Link. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Link. The network helps show where Michael Link may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Link
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Link.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Link based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Link. Michael Link is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Arthur Lupia, Joshua D. Clinton, et al.. (2023). Protecting the integrity of survey research. PNAS Nexus. 2(3). pgad049–pgad049.9 indexed citations
Brzoska, Michael, et al.. (2012). Geoengineering: An issue for peace and security?.1 indexed citations
5.
Baker, Reg, Stephen J. Blumberg, J. Michael Brick, et al.. (2010). Research Synthesis: AAPOR Report on Online Panels. Public Opinion Quarterly. 74(4). 711–781.452 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Link, Michael, et al.. (2009). Reaching the U.S. Cell Phone Generation: Comparison of Cell Phone Survey Results with an Ongoing Landline Telephone Survey. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Link, Michael, et al.. (2006). Peer Reviewed: Race, Ethnicity, and Linguistic Isolation as Determinants of Participation in Public Health Surveillance Surveys. Preventing Chronic Disease. 3(1).1 indexed citations
9.
Ford, Earl S., Ali H. Mokdad, Michael Link, et al.. (2006). PEER REVIEWED: Chronic Disease in Health Emergencies: In the Eye of the Hurricane. Preventing Chronic Disease. 3(2).1 indexed citations
10.
Link, Michael & Ali H. Mokdad. (2006). Can web an mail survey modes improve participation in an RDD-based National Health Surveillance?. Journal of Official Statistics. 22(2). 293–312.31 indexed citations
Guinn, Curry, Robert Hubal, Robin R. Deterding, et al.. (2004). Usability and Acceptability Studies of Conversational Virtual Human Technology.. Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 1–8.7 indexed citations
16.
Siegel, Peter, et al.. (2002). National Post-secondary Student Aid Study 1999-2000 (NPSAS:2000) Methodology Report.. 4(2).4 indexed citations
Link, Michael, et al.. (1997). On the Identification of Rigid Body Properties of an Elastic System. SPIE eBooks. 3089. 1588–1594.5 indexed citations
19.
Link, Michael, et al.. (1991). Updating and localizing structural errors based on minimization of equation errors. ESASP. 2. 503–510.7 indexed citations
20.
Link, Michael. (1981). Outdoor education : a manual for teaching in nature's classroom. Prentice Hall eBooks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.