Marie‐Claire Smith
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Neurology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Cathy M. StinearWinston D. ByblowP. Alan BarberSuzanne AckerleyVictor M. BorgesBenjamin D. GreenbergPaul J. SchmidtDavid Rubinow
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (21 papers)Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (11 papers)Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Marie‐Claire Smith
25 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Rehabilitation 804
- Neurology 557
- Cognitive Neuroscience 368
- Epidemiology 324
- Neurology 289
Countries citing papers authored by Marie‐Claire Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Marie‐Claire Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marie‐Claire Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marie‐Claire Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marie‐Claire Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marie‐Claire Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marie‐Claire Smith. The network helps show where Marie‐Claire Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marie‐Claire Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marie‐Claire Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marie‐Claire Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marie‐Claire Smith. Marie‐Claire Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 105 | |
| 13 | 126 | |
| 14 | 71 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 68 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Properties of pre-sympathetic neurones in the rostral ventrolateral medulla in the rat: an intracellular study in vivo | 1 |
| 20 | 105 |
About Marie‐Claire Smith
Marie‐Claire Smith is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Neurology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (21 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (11 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (804 citations), Neurology (557 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (103 citations). Marie‐Claire Smith has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cathy M. Stinear, Winston D. Byblow, P. Alan Barber, Suzanne Ackerley, Victor M. Borges, Benjamin D. Greenberg, Paul J. Schmidt, David Rubinow, John Keel and Linda F. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.