Marie Roué

28 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers

Marie Roué
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Geography, Planning and Development 35
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 43
  • Forestry 14
  • General Health Professions 75
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 56
Replace Aroha Te Pareake Mead with:
Aroha Te Pareake Mead Canada
Ruifei Tang New Zealand
Ronald Ignace Canada
Marianne Ignace Canada
Chelsey Geralda Armstrong Canada
Débora Peterson Canada
Jonaki Bhattacharyya Canada
David Harmon United States
Piers Vitebsky United Kingdom
William C. Clarke Australia
Marie Roué relative to Aroha Te Pareake Mead Canada Aroha Te Pareake Mead's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Aroha Te Pareake Mead · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marie Roué

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marie Roué's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marie Roué with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marie Roué more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marie Roué

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marie Roué. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marie Roué. The network helps show where Marie Roué may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Marie Roué, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marie Roué Line = papers co-authored together Marie Roué links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200968
2 201231
3 200227
4 201724
5 200620
6 200919
7 200215
8 201510
9 20137
10 20037
11 20226
12 20036
13 20146
14 20085
15 19864
16
Biocultural diversity, pollinators and their socio-cultural values
20173
17 20053
18 20033
19 20053
20 19942

About Marie Roué

Marie Roué is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Archeology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Urban and Social Studies (12 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (12 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (5 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (4 papers), Cultural Identity and Heritage (3 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers) and Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (35 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (43 citations), Forestry (14 citations), General Health Professions (75 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (56 citations). Marie Roué has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Roturier, Douglas Nakashima, Romain Simenel, Vincent Battesti, Claire Lamine, Igor Krupnik, Serge Bahuchet, Guiomar Nates‐Parra, M. M. Maués and David W. Roubik. Their work appears in journals such as Natures Sciences Sociétés, Ethnologie française, Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research, Forest Ecology and Management and International Social Science Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact