María Cubel
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Safety Research top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (13 papers)Income, Poverty, and Inequality (5 papers)Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Economic JournalJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainAustralia
In The Last Decade
María Cubel
15 papers receiving 258 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Economics and Econometrics 135
- Sociology and Political Science 79
- Safety Research 44
- Political Science and International Relations 25
- Clinical Psychology 23
Countries citing papers authored by María Cubel
This map shows the geographic impact of María Cubel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by María Cubel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites María Cubel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by María Cubel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by María Cubel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by María Cubel. The network helps show where María Cubel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of María Cubel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of María Cubel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of María Cubel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with María Cubel. María Cubel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 79 | |
| 10 | Solidaridad entre regiones: Un ejercicio experimental | 0 |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 75 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | El Fondo de Compensación Interterritorial: simulaciones de reforma | 0 |
| 17 | La reforma del FCI ante las nuevas Perspectivas Financieras de la UE | 1 |
| 18 | La descentralización de las políticas de inclusión social | 0 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About María Cubel
María Cubel is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Decision Sciences and Business and International Management, having authored 21 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (13 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (5 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (13 citations), Safety Research (44 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (135 citations). María Cubel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Santiago Sánchez‐Pagés, Marian Vidal-Fernández and Peter J. Lambert. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Economic Journal and Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.