Marga Kreckel
About
In The Last Decade
Marga Kreckel
6 papers receiving 109 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Language and Linguistics 51
- Sociology and Political Science 37
- Literature and Literary Theory 32
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 30
- Social Psychology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Marga Kreckel
This map shows the geographic impact of Marga Kreckel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marga Kreckel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marga Kreckel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marga Kreckel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marga Kreckel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marga Kreckel. The network helps show where Marga Kreckel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marga Kreckel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marga Kreckel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marga Kreckel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marga Kreckel. Marga Kreckel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | Communicative Acts and Shared Knowledge in Natural Discourse | 49 |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 4 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.