Marcus Smith

32 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Marcus Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Safety Research 28
  • Signal Processing 24
  • Information Systems 49
  • Law 21
Replace Samuel Carton with:
Samuel Carton United States
Caleb Ziems United States
Quan Ze Chen United States
Nóra Ní Loideáin United Kingdom
Ben Chester Cheong Singapore
Robert Chesney United States
Tobias Matzner Germany
Bibi van den Berg Netherlands
Brian Wentz United States
Aida Mostafazadeh Davani United States
Marcus Smith relative to Samuel Carton United States Samuel Carton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Samuel Carton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marcus Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marcus Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcus Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcus Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marcus Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcus Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcus Smith. The network helps show where Marcus Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Marcus Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marcus Smith Line = papers co-authored together Marcus Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202190
2 201816
3 201115
4 202111
5 202011
6 20238
7 20197
8 20176
9 20216
10 20155
11 20235
12 20185
13 20214
14 20184
15 20214
16 20223
17 20233
18
A modern approach to regulation: Integrating law, system architecture and blockchain technology in Australia
20203
19
The Law of Assignment: The Creation and Transfer of Choses in Action
20073
20
Trial by jury; a pilot study of juror perception of mental health professional testimony in NGRI pleas for first degree international homicide.
19963

About Marcus Smith

Marcus Smith is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Genetics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 34 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (6 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (5 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Global Security and Public Health (3 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (2 papers) and Legal principles and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (8 citations), Safety Research (28 citations), Signal Processing (24 citations), Information Systems (49 citations) and Law (21 citations). Marcus Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Seumas Miller, Monique Mann, Rachael C. Heath Jeffery, Milind Tiwari, Patrick Walsh, J. D. Gaffey, Russell Smith, Anthony Morgan, Giulio Palermo and Mark Nolan. Their work appears in journals such as AI & Society, Bioethics, Australian Journal Of International Affairs, The British Accounting Review and Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact