Marco Neppi-Mòdona
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Co-authors
- Raffaella RicciAnna BertiLorenzo PiaIrene RongaPietro SarassoFrancesca GarbariniEdoardo BisiachKatiuscia Sacco
- Topics
- Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (22 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Marco Neppi-Mòdona
39 papers receiving 822 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Cognitive Neuroscience 680
- Social Psychology 229
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 162
- Psychiatry and Mental health 111
- Human-Computer Interaction 105
Countries citing papers authored by Marco Neppi-Mòdona
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Neppi-Mòdona's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Neppi-Mòdona with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Neppi-Mòdona more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marco Neppi-Mòdona
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Neppi-Mòdona. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Neppi-Mòdona. The network helps show where Marco Neppi-Mòdona may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco Neppi-Mòdona
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco Neppi-Mòdona. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco Neppi-Mòdona based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marco Neppi-Mòdona. Marco Neppi-Mòdona is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 51 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 80 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Marco Neppi-Mòdona
Marco Neppi-Mòdona is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 836 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (22 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (680 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (105 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (162 citations). Marco Neppi-Mòdona has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Raffaella Ricci, Anna Berti, Lorenzo Pia, Irene Ronga, Pietro Sarasso, Francesca Garbarini, Edoardo Bisiach, Katiuscia Sacco, Carlotta Fossataro and Patrizia Gindri. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Scientific Reports and Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.