Daniele Romano
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Angelo MaravitaGabriella BottiniOlaf BlankeMartina GandolaAndy ZaidmanFiorenzo FranceschiniChristian PfeifferPeter Brugger
- Topics
- Action Observation and Synchronization (20 papers)Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (19 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (12 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Daniele Romano
74 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 650
- Human-Computer Interaction 450
- Social Psychology 432
- Psychiatry and Mental health 267
- Information Systems 169
Countries citing papers authored by Daniele Romano
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniele Romano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniele Romano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniele Romano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniele Romano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniele Romano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniele Romano. The network helps show where Daniele Romano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniele Romano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniele Romano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniele Romano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniele Romano. Daniele Romano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 80 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Daniele Romano
Daniele Romano is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Action Observation and Synchronization (20 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (19 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (450 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (650 citations) and Software (90 citations). Daniele Romano has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Angelo Maravita, Gabriella Bottini, Olaf Blanke, Martina Gandola, Andy Zaidman, Fiorenzo Franceschini, Christian Pfeiffer, Peter Brugger, Joan Llobera and Marco Perugini. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.