Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Short-Term Traffic Flow Forecasting: An Experimental Comparison of Time-Series Analysis and Supervised Learning
2013560 citationsMarco Lippi, Paolo Frasconi et al.profile →
Attention in Natural Language Processing
2020406 citationsAndrea Galassi, Marco Lippi et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Lippi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Lippi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Lippi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Lippi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Lippi. The network helps show where Marco Lippi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco Lippi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco Lippi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco Lippi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marco Lippi. Marco Lippi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lagioia, Francesca, et al.. (2020). Explaining Potentially Unfair Clauses to the Consumer with the CLAUDETTE tool.. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 61–64.1 indexed citations
10.
Galassi, Andrea, Marco Lippi, & Paolo Torroni. (2019). Attention, please! A critical review of neural attention models in natural language processing. arXiv (Cornell University). 1–18.22 indexed citations
11.
Contissa, Giuseppe, Francesca Lagioia, Marco Lippi, et al.. (2019). GDPR Privacy Policies in CLAUDETTE: Challenges of Omission, Context and Multilingualism. 2385. 1–7.6 indexed citations
Kiziltan, Zeynep, Marco Lippi, & Paolo Torroni. (2016). Constraint detection in natural language problem descriptions. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 744–750.6 indexed citations
14.
Lippi, Marco & Paolo Torroni. (2015). Context-independent claim detection for argument mining. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 2015. 185–191.57 indexed citations
Passerini, Andrea, Marco Lippi, & Paolo Frasconi. (2011). Predicting Metal-Binding Sites from Protein Sequence. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. 9(1). 203–213.17 indexed citations
Lippi, Marco. (1979). I prezzi di produzione : un saggio sulla teoria di Sraffa.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.