Marco De Cecco
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Aging top 1%
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- John M. SedivyNicola NerettiJill A. KreilingSteven W. CriscioneAbigail L. PetersonSara HillenmeyerXiaoai ZhaoMarina P. Antoch
- Topics
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers)Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (5 papers)Animal Genetics and Reproduction (4 papers)
- Journals
- CellPLoS ONECell Metabolism
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyRussia
In The Last Decade
Marco De Cecco
15 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Molecular Biology 967
- Physiology 353
- Plant Science 352
- Aging 194
- Immunology 179
Countries citing papers authored by Marco De Cecco
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco De Cecco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco De Cecco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco De Cecco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marco De Cecco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco De Cecco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco De Cecco. The network helps show where Marco De Cecco may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco De Cecco
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco De Cecco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco De Cecco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marco De Cecco. Marco De Cecco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | LINE1 Derepression in Aged Wild-Type and SIRT6-Deficient Mice Drives Inflammationbreakdown → | 305 |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 104 | |
| 5 | 203 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 303 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 248 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | CMV-based episomal vector is progressively lost in vivo in multi-gene transgenic pigs produced by SMGT | 3 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | A method for uptake quantification of multiple fluorescent DNAs in boar semen as an alternative to radiolabeling. | 3 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 18 |
About Marco De Cecco
Marco De Cecco is a scholar working on Aging, Biophysics and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (5 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (194 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (60 citations) and Molecular Biology (967 citations). Marco De Cecco has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Russia. Frequent co-authors include John M. Sedivy, Nicola Neretti, Jill A. Kreiling, Steven W. Criscione, Abigail L. Peterson, Sara Hillenmeyer, Xiaoai Zhao, Marina P. Antoch, Vadim N. Gladyshev and Taketo Taguchi. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, PLoS ONE and Cell Metabolism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.