Marcia Hills
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Nursing education and management 3
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health Policy Implementation Science 5
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 3
- Public Health Policies and Education 3
- Community Health and Development 2
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 2
- Speech and Hearing top 10%
- School Health and Nursing Education 4
-
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units 3
In The Last Decade
Marcia Hills
31 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Research and Theory 40
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 14
- General Health Professions 171
- Leadership and Management 7
- Speech and Hearing 36
Countries citing papers authored by Marcia Hills
This map shows the geographic impact of Marcia Hills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcia Hills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcia Hills more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marcia Hills
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcia Hills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcia Hills. The network helps show where Marcia Hills may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Marcia Hills, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 10 | [Towards a framework to assess the effectiveness of community-based health promotion initiatives: recent North-American developments]. | 2004 | 1 |
| 11 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 24 | |
| 19 | Staff nurse perceptions of stressors and support needs in their workplace. | 1993 | 7 |
| 20 | The Power of Peers in Employee Assistance: A Unique Program for a Community College. | 1989 | 2 |
About Marcia Hills
Marcia Hills is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Speech and Hearing, having authored 32 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (40 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations) and General Health Professions (171 citations). Marcia Hills has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Mullett, Jean Watson, Simon Carroll, Elizabeth W. Lindsey, Gwen Hartrick, Chantal Cara, Michel O’Neill, David V. McQueen, Peggy Johnson and Mary Amuyunzu‐Nyamongo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.