Mara Breen

1.5k total citations
28 papers, 677 citations indexed

About

Mara Breen is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mara Breen has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 677 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mara Breen's work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (16 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers). Mara Breen is often cited by papers focused on Phonetics and Phonology Research (16 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers). Mara Breen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Mara Breen's co-authors include Edward Gibson, Evelina Fedorenko, Charles Clifton, Michael Wagner, Laura C. Dilley, Adam Tierney, Aniruddh D. Patel, John D. Kraemer, Duáne G. Watson and Roger Lévy and has published in prestigious journals such as Cognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Mara Breen

28 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mara Breen United States 14 437 369 250 186 156 28 677
Johanneke Caspers Netherlands 13 591 1.4× 192 0.5× 176 0.7× 296 1.6× 355 2.3× 49 830
Isabelle Darcy United States 15 456 1.0× 245 0.7× 377 1.5× 121 0.7× 202 1.3× 47 709
Yukari Hirata United States 14 564 1.3× 129 0.3× 241 1.0× 227 1.2× 117 0.8× 37 660
Titia Benders Australia 12 383 0.9× 145 0.4× 255 1.0× 107 0.6× 58 0.4× 42 512
Andrea G. Levitt United States 17 828 1.9× 226 0.6× 469 1.9× 342 1.8× 149 1.0× 30 1.1k
Rebecca M. Dauer United States 4 601 1.4× 174 0.5× 186 0.7× 251 1.3× 207 1.3× 7 756
Kiwako Ito United States 12 350 0.8× 293 0.8× 253 1.0× 105 0.6× 164 1.1× 34 540
Paula Fikkert Netherlands 14 426 1.0× 171 0.5× 454 1.8× 110 0.6× 157 1.0× 84 677
Louisa M. Slowiaczek United States 16 739 1.7× 677 1.8× 642 2.6× 245 1.3× 129 0.8× 30 1.2k
Melissa A. Redford United States 13 389 0.9× 157 0.4× 259 1.0× 147 0.8× 87 0.6× 55 548

Countries citing papers authored by Mara Breen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mara Breen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mara Breen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mara Breen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mara Breen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mara Breen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mara Breen. The network helps show where Mara Breen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mara Breen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mara Breen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mara Breen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mara Breen. Mara Breen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Breen, Mara, Julie A. Van Dyke, Jelena Krivokapić, & Nicole Landi. (2024). Prosodic features in production reflect reading comprehension skill in high school students.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 50(10). 1662–1682. 2 indexed citations
2.
White, Christopher W., Joe Pater, & Mara Breen. (2022). A comparative analysis of melodic rhythm in two corpora of American popular music. Journal of Mathematics and Music. 16(2). 160–182. 2 indexed citations
3.
Tierney, Adam, Aniruddh D. Patel, Kyle Jasmin, & Mara Breen. (2021). Individual differences in perception of the speech-to-song illusion are linked to musical aptitude but not musical training.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 47(12). 1681–1697. 14 indexed citations
4.
Breen, Mara, et al.. (2019). Event-Related Potential Evidence of Implicit Metric Structure during Silent Reading. Brain Sciences. 9(8). 192–192. 8 indexed citations
5.
Breen, Mara. (2018). Effects of metric hierarchy and rhyme predictability on word duration in The Cat in the Hat. Cognition. 174. 71–81. 12 indexed citations
6.
Tierney, Adam, Aniruddh D. Patel, & Mara Breen. (2018). Acoustic foundations of the speech-to-song illusion.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 147(6). 888–904. 30 indexed citations
7.
Breen, Mara, Chigusa Kurumada, Michael Wagner, Duáne G. Watson, & Kristine M. Yu. (2018). Introducing prosodic variability. Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology. 9(1). 1 indexed citations
8.
Brugos, Alejna, Mara Breen, Nanette Veilleux, Jonathan Barnes, & Stefanie Shattuck‐Hufnagel. (2018). Cue-based annotation and analysis of prosodic boundary events. 245–249. 4 indexed citations
9.
Breen, Mara, et al.. (2016). Imitated Prosodic Fluency Predicts Reading Comprehension Ability in Good and Poor High School Readers. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 1026–1026. 21 indexed citations
10.
Breen, Mara, Laura C. Dilley, J. Devin McAuley, & Lisa D. Sanders. (2014). Auditory evoked potentials reveal early perceptual effects of distal prosody on speech segmentation. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 29(9). 1132–1146. 19 indexed citations
11.
Breen, Mara. (2014). Empirical Investigations of the Role of Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing. Language and Linguistics Compass. 8(2). 37–50. 54 indexed citations
12.
Breen, Mara, et al.. (2014). Rhythm and Expression in The Cat in the Hat. 472–476. 4 indexed citations
13.
Breen, Mara & Charles Clifton. (2013). Stress Matters Revisited: A Boundary Change Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 66(10). 1896–1909. 29 indexed citations
14.
Breen, Mara, John Kingston, & Lisa D. Sanders. (2012). Perceptual representations of phonotactically illegal syllables. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 75(1). 101–120. 14 indexed citations
15.
Lévy, Roger, Evelina Fedorenko, Mara Breen, & Edward Gibson. (2011). The processing of extraposed structures in English. Cognition. 122(1). 12–36. 57 indexed citations
16.
Breen, Mara & Charles Clifton. (2010). Stress matters: Effects of anticipated lexical stress on silent reading. Journal of Memory and Language. 64(2). 153–170. 77 indexed citations
17.
Breen, Mara, Evelina Fedorenko, Michael Wagner, & Edward Gibson. (2010). Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes. 25(7-9). 1044–1098. 191 indexed citations
18.
Brugos, Alejna, Nanette Veilleux, Mara Breen, & Stefanie Shattuck‐Hufnagel. (2008). The alternatives (alt) tier for toBI: advantages of capturing prosodic ambiguity. 273–276. 7 indexed citations
19.
Watson, Duáne G., Mara Breen, & Edward Gibson. (2006). The role of syntactic obligatoriness in the production of intonational boundaries.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 32(5). 1045–1056. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026