Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología
20131.4k citationsManuel Ato, Juan José López García et al.Anales de Psicologíaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Manuel Ato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manuel Ato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuel Ato more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manuel Ato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manuel Ato. The network helps show where Manuel Ato may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Manuel Ato
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Manuel Ato.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Manuel Ato based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Manuel Ato. Manuel Ato is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ato, Manuel, Juan José López García, & Ana Benavente. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología. 29(3).1353 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Ato, Manuel, Juan José López García, & Ana Benavente. (2011). A simulation study of rater agreement measures with 2x2 contingency tables. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
4.
Ato, Manuel & Guillermo Vallejo. (2011). Los efectos de terceras variables en la investigación psicológica. Anales de Psicología. 27(2). 550–561.35 indexed citations
Ramírez, Fuensanta Cerezo & Manuel Ato. (2010). Social status, gender, classroom climate and bullying among adolescents pupils. Anales de Psicología. 26(1). 137–144.69 indexed citations
Abenza‐Cano, Lucía, et al.. (2010). Análisis de la relación entre el estado de ánimo y las conductas de adherencia en deportistas lesionados. Anales de Psicología. 26(1). 159–168.8 indexed citations
Benavente, Ana, Manuel Ato, & Juan José López García. (2006). Procedimientos para detectar y medir el sesgo entre observadores. Anales de Psicología. 22(1). 161–167.2 indexed citations
11.
Ato, Manuel, et al.. (2006). [Individual differences in the linguistic competence of referential and expressive subjects].. PubMed. 18(1). 37–42.3 indexed citations
Vallejo, Guillermo, Pedro Fernández, & Manuel Ato. (2003). Tasas de potencia de dos enfoques robustos para analizar datos longitudinales. 24(1). 109–122.3 indexed citations
15.
Ato, Manuel, et al.. (2001). Eating behavior by gender: An alternative methodological approach for the analysis of categorical data. Psicothema. 13(2). 271–276.2 indexed citations
Ato, Manuel. (1998). Metodología de la investigación en psicología: perspectiva histórica. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 371–388.1 indexed citations
18.
García, Juan José López & Manuel Ato. (1994). Procedimientos analíticos para el ajuste de diseños multivariantes de medidas repetidas. Psicothema. 6(3). 447–463.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.