Manqi Deng

985 citations
15 papers · 763 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
    • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Aging top 5%

Papers in

Manqi Deng

14 papers receiving 753 citations

Peers

Manqi Deng
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Cell Biology 392
  • Aging 41
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 511
  • Reproductive Medicine 126
  • Molecular Biology 377
Replace Kexi Yi with:
Kexi Yi United States
Jessica Azoury France
Catherine Thibier France
Jibak Lee Japan
Agathe Chaigne France
Suzanne Madgwick United Kingdom
Anna Ajduk Poland
Ruby Chen United States
Christophe Lefebvre France
Marie‐Louise Kann France
Manqi Deng relative to Kexi Yi United States Kexi Yi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Kexi Yi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Manqi Deng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manqi Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manqi Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manqi Deng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Manqi Deng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manqi Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manqi Deng. The network helps show where Manqi Deng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Manqi Deng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Manqi Deng Line = papers co-authored together Manqi Deng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2011226
2 2007151
3 200472
4 200367
5 200457
6 200035
7 200134
8 199831
9 201130
10 200924
11 200919
12 20246
13 20126
14
Intracellular Ca2+ during fertilization and artificial activation in mouse oocytes.
19965
15 19970

About Manqi Deng

Manqi Deng is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Physiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (11 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (6 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (4 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper), Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper) and Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (392 citations), Aging (41 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (511 citations), Reproductive Medicine (126 citations) and Molecular Biology (377 citations). Manqi Deng has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. Schultz, Rong Li, Praveen Suraneni, Jay R. Unruh, Brian D. Slaughter, Boris Rubinstein, Kexi Yi, Carmen J. Williams, Sheldon S. Shen and Xiangzhong Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Biology, Biology of Reproduction, PLoS ONE, Developmental Cell and Cell Division.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact