Manolo Martínez

736 citations
31 papers · 315 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Manolo Martínez

30 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Manolo Martínez
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • History and Philosophy of Science 73
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 164
  • Philosophy 82
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
  • Social Psychology 53
Replace Inês Hipólito with:
Inês Hipólito Germany
Julia Tanney United Kingdom
Michael Rescorla United States
Jesper Kallestrup United Kingdom
Wanja Wiese Germany
Sara Bizarro Portugal
Jennifer Mundale United States
Emma C. Gordon United Kingdom
Mark Sprevak United Kingdom
Güven Güzeldere United States
Manolo Martínez relative to Inês Hipólito Germany Inês Hipólito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34×
Inês Hipólito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Manolo Martínez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manolo Martínez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manolo Martínez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manolo Martínez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Manolo Martínez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manolo Martínez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manolo Martínez. The network helps show where Manolo Martínez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Manolo Martínez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Manolo Martínez Line = papers co-authored together Manolo Martínez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201075
2 201327
3 201427
4 201522
5 201520
6 201320
7 201617
8 201412
9 202210
10 20199
11 20118
12
Disgusting Smells and Imperativism
20157
13 20197
14 20147
15 20236
16 20196
17 20215
18 20175
19 20114
20 20154

About Manolo Martínez

Manolo Martínez is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 31 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (6 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (5 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations), Philosophy (82 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations) and Social Psychology (53 citations). Manolo Martínez has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Godfrey‐Smith, Colin Klein, M. Carles, Miguel Ángel Sebastián, J. Benlloch, Luca Barlassina, Andrea González-Montoro, Antonio J. González, Georgios Konstantinou and Bence Nánay. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Erkenntnis, Philosophy of Science, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and The Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact