Manoj Monga

10.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
295 papers, 6.5k citations indexed

About

Manoj Monga is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Manoj Monga has authored 295 papers receiving a total of 6.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 238 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 119 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 85 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Manoj Monga's work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (217 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (119 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (85 papers). Manoj Monga is often cited by papers focused on Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (217 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (119 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (85 papers). Manoj Monga collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Manoj Monga's co-authors include Renato N. Pedro, Kari Hendlin, Bryan Hinck, Brian R. Matlaga, Ojas Shah, Vernon M. Pais, Amy E. Krambeck, Jaime Landman, Nicole L. Miller and Dean G. Assimos and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Manoj Monga

284 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I

2016 936 citations Manoj Monga et al. The Journal of Urology profile →

Peers

Manoj Monga

PRM

PPCH

OG

UROLO

SURGE

John D. Denstedt Canada

Kemal Sarıca Türkiye

Hassan Razvi Canada

Brian R. Matlaga United States

Andreas Skolarikos Greece

Marshall L. Stoller United States

Mahesh Desai India

Ben H. Chew Canada

Olivier Traxer France

Ahmed A. Shokeir Egypt

John D. Denstedt Canada

Manoj Monga

5.6k ×1.1

PRM

3.7k ×1.0

PPCH

2.2k ×1.1

OG

1.5k ×1.6

UROLO

1.3k ×1.5

SURGE

Citations per year, relative to Manoj Monga Manoj Monga (= 1×) peers John D. Denstedt

Countries citing papers authored by Manoj Monga

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Manoj Monga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manoj Monga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manoj Monga more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Manoj Monga

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manoj Monga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manoj Monga. The network helps show where Manoj Monga may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Manoj Monga

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Manoj Monga. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Manoj Monga based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Manoj Monga. Manoj Monga is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Torricelli, Fábio César Miranda, Victor Srougi, Giovanni Scala Marchini, et al.. (2024). Ureteroscopy vs laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large proximal ureteric stone: a randomised trial. British Journal of Urology. 134(5). 747–754. 2 indexed citations

2.

Monga, Manoj, et al.. (2023). Prevalence of Stone Disease and Procedure Trends in the United States. Urology. 176. 63–68. 24 indexed citations

3.

Stefano, Virgilio De, Daniele Castellani, Bhaskar Somani, et al.. (2023). Suction in Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: Evolution, Development, and Outcomes from Experimental and Clinical studies. Results from a Systematic Review. European Urology Focus. 10(1). 154–168. 18 indexed citations

4.

Vicentini, Fábio C., Eduardo Mazzucchi, Mehmet İlker Gökçe, et al.. (2020). Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Horseshoe Kidneys: Results of a Multicentric Study. Journal of Endourology. 35(7). 979–984. 8 indexed citations

5.

Stern, Karen, Ryan Ward, Jianbo Li, et al.. (2019). Nonrenal Systemic Arterial Calcification Predicts the Formation of Kidney Stones. Journal of Endourology. 33(12). 1032–1034. 5 indexed citations

6.

Hinck, Bryan, et al.. (2018). Hybrid guidewires: Analysis and comparison of the mechanical properties and safety profiles. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 13(2). 59–63. 3 indexed citations

7.

Torricelli, Fábio César Miranda, et al.. (2017). Multiple Uric Acid Bladder Stones: Clinical Presentation and Endoscopic Management. Journal of Endourology Case Reports. 3(1). 21–23. 5 indexed citations

8.

Hinck, Bryan, et al.. (2017). Can a Simplified 12-Hour Nighttime Urine Collection Predict Urinary Stone Risk?. Urology. 108. 40–45. 6 indexed citations

9.

Gul, Zeynep, et al.. (2016). Predicting procedural pain after ureteroscopy: does hydrodistention play a role?. International braz j urol. 42(4). 734–739. 11 indexed citations

10.

Omar, Mohamed, et al.. (2015). Shared decision making: why do patients choose ureteroscopy?. Urolithiasis. 44(2). 167–172. 21 indexed citations

11.

Sarkissian, Carl, et al.. (2014). Tissue Damage from Ultrasonic, Pneumatic, and Combination Lithotripsy. Journal of Endourology. 29(2). 162–170. 6 indexed citations

12.

Monga, Manoj. (2013). Ureteroscopy : indications, instrumentation & technique. Humana Press eBooks. 9 indexed citations

13.

Monga, Manoj. (2011). How to manage urolithiasis. Contemporary ob/gyn. 1 indexed citations

14.

Monga, Manoj. (2011). The effect of fat and nonfat components of the skin-to-stone distance on shockwave lithotripsy outcome. International braz j urol. 37(1). 116–116.

15.

Monga, Manoj, et al.. (2010). The Cobra Dual-Channel Flexible Ureteroscope: Novel Function, Novel Applications. Videourology. 24(1). 4 indexed citations

16.

Monga, Manoj, Renato N. Pedro, Carly Kriedberg, & Kari Hendlin. (2007). MP-03.01: Wire-based ureteral stents: Impact on tensile strength and compression. Urology. 70(3). 52–52. 3 indexed citations

17.

Canales, Benjamin K., Derek Weiland, Joel W. Slaton, et al.. (2006). Angiomyofibroblastoma‐like tumors (cellular angiofibroma). International Journal of Urology. 13(2). 177–179. 29 indexed citations

18.

Weiland, Derek, Benjamin K. Canales, Anup P. Ramani, & Manoj Monga. (2005). Laparoscopic ureterectomy for the management of painful calculi in a ureteral stump. International Journal of Urology. 12(9). 845–846. 3 indexed citations

19.

Weiland, Derek, Benjamin K. Canales, & Manoj Monga. (2005). Medical devices used for ureteroscopy for renal calculi. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 3(1). 73–80. 9 indexed citations

20.

Borboroglu, Prodromos G., Christopher L. Amling, Noah S. Schenkman, et al.. (2001). URETERAL STENTING AFTER URETEROSCOPY FOR DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY ASSESSING PAIN, OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS. The Journal of Urology. 166(5). 1651–1657. 109 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact