Amy E. Krambeck

13.4k total citations · 3 hit papers
282 papers, 8.9k citations indexed

About

Amy E. Krambeck is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Urology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy E. Krambeck has authored 282 papers receiving a total of 8.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 230 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 111 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 89 papers in Urology. Recurrent topics in Amy E. Krambeck's work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (157 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (111 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (78 papers). Amy E. Krambeck is often cited by papers focused on Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (157 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (111 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (78 papers). Amy E. Krambeck collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Philippines. Amy E. Krambeck's co-authors include Andrew D. Rule, John C. Lieske, James E. Lingeman, Eric J. Bergstralh, Matthew T. Gettman, Nicole L. Miller, Brian R. Matlaga, Vernon M. Pais, Michael L. Blute and Ojas Shah and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Amy E. Krambeck

272 papers receiving 8.7k citations

Hit Papers

Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Associ... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 2016 2020 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy E. Krambeck United States 46 7.0k 3.7k 1.9k 1.3k 1.2k 282 8.9k
Andreas Skolarikos Greece 42 5.7k 0.8× 3.6k 1.0× 1.6k 0.8× 1.4k 1.1× 1.2k 1.0× 261 7.3k
Thomas Knoll Germany 40 6.4k 0.9× 4.5k 1.2× 1.4k 0.7× 989 0.8× 1.5k 1.3× 203 8.1k
Brian R. Matlaga United States 46 6.7k 1.0× 4.2k 1.1× 1.1k 0.6× 970 0.7× 1.3k 1.0× 211 8.0k
P. Alken Germany 48 6.2k 0.9× 4.1k 1.1× 2.3k 1.2× 2.6k 2.0× 1.5k 1.2× 409 10.4k
Stephen Y. Nakada United States 51 8.1k 1.2× 5.3k 1.4× 1.3k 0.7× 1.8k 1.4× 1.6k 1.3× 302 10.2k
Olivier Traxer France 51 8.7k 1.2× 5.6k 1.5× 1.7k 0.9× 1.8k 1.4× 2.4k 2.0× 471 10.7k
Michele Gallucci Italy 49 5.1k 0.7× 2.4k 0.6× 1.7k 0.9× 3.0k 2.3× 861 0.7× 364 10.1k
Ahmed A. Shokeir Egypt 44 3.6k 0.5× 2.6k 0.7× 1.6k 0.9× 1.9k 1.5× 739 0.6× 314 6.8k
Margaret S. Pearle United States 53 11.4k 1.6× 7.9k 2.2× 1.7k 0.9× 2.2k 1.7× 2.3k 1.9× 239 14.1k
Christian Seitz Austria 35 4.4k 0.6× 2.5k 0.7× 922 0.5× 1.7k 1.3× 798 0.7× 136 5.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Krambeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Krambeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Krambeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Krambeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Krambeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Krambeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Krambeck. The network helps show where Amy E. Krambeck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy E. Krambeck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy E. Krambeck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy E. Krambeck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy E. Krambeck. Amy E. Krambeck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dean, Nicholas, Justin Lee, Michael Schulster, et al.. (2025). Multicenter Review of Obstetric Management and Complications of Ureteroscopy During Pregnancy. Journal of Endourology. 39(10). 1005–1009.
3.
Dean, Nicholas, et al.. (2024). Do Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) lesions predict holmium laser enucleation of prostate outcomes?. The Prostate. 84(14). 1344–1351. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bhojani, Naeem, Larry E. Miller, Esteban Emiliani, et al.. (2024). Durability of Laser Endoureterotomy for the Treatment of Benign Ureteral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JU Open Plus. 2(10).
6.
Dean, Nicholas, et al.. (2023). MP13-13 WOLF 24F VS. STORZ 28F LASER SCOPE FOR HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION OF THE PROSTATE (HOLEP): INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A PROSPECTIVE RCT. The Journal of Urology. 209(Supplement 4). 1 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Loren M., Ahmed Ghazi, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, et al.. (2022). The Endourological Society Inaugural Census Report. Journal of Endourology. 37(2). 199–206. 1 indexed citations
8.
Dean, Nicholas & Amy E. Krambeck. (2022). Endourologic Procedures of the Upper Urinary Tract and the Effects on Intrarenal Pressure and Temperature. Journal of Endourology. 37(2). 191–198. 10 indexed citations
9.
Agarwal, Deepak, Tim Large, Yan Tong, et al.. (2021). Same Day Discharge is a Successful Approach for the Majority of Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. European Urology Focus. 8(1). 228–234. 39 indexed citations
10.
Sivaguru, Mayandi, Elena Wilson, John C. Lieske, et al.. (2021). Human kidney stones: a natural record of universal biomineralization. Nature Reviews Urology. 18(7). 404–432. 45 indexed citations
11.
Lee, Matthew, Mark Assmus, Deepak Agarwal, et al.. (2021). Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy May Be Cost-Effective Compared to Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology. 36(2). 176–182. 11 indexed citations
12.
Lee, Matthew, Mark Assmus, Deepak Agarwal, et al.. (2021). Opioid Free Ureteroscopy: What is the True Failure Rate?. Urology. 154. 89–95. 4 indexed citations
13.
Lee, Matthew, Mark Assmus, Lauren Folgosa Cooley, et al.. (2021). Ex Vivo Comparison of Efficiency, Safety, and Surgeon Satisfaction in Four Commercial Morcellators. Journal of Endourology. 36(4). 514–521. 2 indexed citations
14.
Nottingham, Charles U., et al.. (2020). Critical Assessment of Single-Use Ureteroscopes in an In Vivo Porcine Model. Advances in Urology. 2020. 1–4. 5 indexed citations
15.
Thongprayoon, Charat, Amy E. Krambeck, & Andrew D. Rule. (2020). Determining the true burden of kidney stone disease. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 16(12). 736–746. 233 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Sivaguru, Mayandi, James C. Williams, John C. Lieske, et al.. (2018). Geobiology reveals how human kidney stones dissolve in vivo. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 13731–13731. 51 indexed citations
17.
Anderson, Blake, et al.. (2018). Trends and Perioperative Outcomes Across Major Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Procedures from the ACS-NSQIP 2011–2015. Journal of Endourology. 33(1). 62–68. 45 indexed citations
18.
Ingimarsson, Johann P., et al.. (2016). Successful Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Immune-Mediated Thrombocytopenia Treated with Romiplostim. Journal of Endourology Case Reports. 2(1). 81–83.
20.
Roth, Timothy J., Yuri Sheinin, Christine M. Lohse, et al.. (2007). B7-H3 Ligand Expression by Prostate Cancer: A Novel Marker of Prognosis and Potential Target for Therapy. Cancer Research. 67(16). 7893–7900. 204 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026