Malcolm I. McMahon

197 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

Malcolm I. McMahon
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Geophysics 4.1k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.6k
  • Materials Chemistry 4.1k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.4k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 579
Replace K. Takemura with:
K. Takemura Japan
Eugene Gregoryanz United Kingdom
Natalia Dubrovinskaia Germany
Agnès Dewaele France
Arthur L. Ruoff United States
K. Syassen Germany
Yuichi Akahama Japan
Hyunchae Cynn United States
A. Polian France
AYYAPPAN JAYARAMAN United States
Malcolm I. McMahon relative to K. Takemura Japan K. Takemura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
K. Takemura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm I. McMahon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm I. McMahon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm I. McMahon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm I. McMahon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm I. McMahon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm I. McMahon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm I. McMahon. The network helps show where Malcolm I. McMahon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm I. McMahon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm I. McMahon Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm I. McMahon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 202 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011244
2 2006242
3 1993216
4 1994190
5 1999149
6 1998147
7 2000146
8 1993145
9 2008144
10 2006141
11 1990127
12 2011127
13 2001101
14 2005100
15 2009100
16 200499
17 199497
18 199697
19 200096
20 200192

About Malcolm I. McMahon

Malcolm I. McMahon is a scholar working on Geophysics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 202 papers that have together received 7.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (142 papers), X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (54 papers), Crystal Structures and Properties (49 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (45 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (28 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (22 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (21 papers) and Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (4.1k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (1.6k citations), Materials Chemistry (4.1k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.4k citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (579 citations). Malcolm I. McMahon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Nelmes, Nicolas G. Wright, L. F. Lundegaard, Olga Degtyareva, Scott A. Belmonte, D.R. Allan, David R. Allan, Clivia Hejny, Eugene Gregoryanz and John S. Loveday. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B, Physical review. B., High Pressure Research and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact