Ulrike Peters
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Oncology top 2%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Nilanjan ChatterjeeRichard B. HayesJohn D. PotterStephen J. ChanockArthur SchatzkinRashmi SinhaSholom WacholderEmily White
- Topics
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (40 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (38 papers)Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (37 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetJAMANature Communications
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Ulrike Peters
189 papers receiving 7.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Molecular Biology 2.1k
- Genetics 2.0k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.9k
- Oncology 1.4k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Peters
This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Peters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Peters
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Peters. The network helps show where Ulrike Peters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrike Peters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrike Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrike Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrike Peters. Ulrike Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Diet-wide analyses for risk of colorectal cancer: prospective study of 12,251 incident cases among 542,778 women in the UKbreakdown → | 21 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | 51 |
About Ulrike Peters
Ulrike Peters is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biochemistry and Cancer Research, having authored 198 papers that have together received 8.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (40 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (38 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (37 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (669 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.9k citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (1.2k citations). Ulrike Peters has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Nilanjan Chatterjee, Richard B. Hayes, John D. Potter, Stephen J. Chanock, Arthur Schatzkin, Rashmi Sinha, Sholom Wacholder, Emily White, Joel L. Weissfeld and Amy F. Subar. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, JAMA and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.