Maisy Best

453 total citations
9 papers, 277 citations indexed

About

Maisy Best is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Maisy Best has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 277 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Maisy Best's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). Maisy Best is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). Maisy Best collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and United States. Maisy Best's co-authors include Esther K. Papies, Frederick Verbruggen, Ian P. L. McLaren, Tobias Stevens, Lawrence W. Barsalou, Natalia Lawrence, Gordon D. Logan, Stephen Monsell, Aureliu Lavric and Heike Elchlepp and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Neuropsychologia and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Maisy Best

9 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Maisy Best United Kingdom	7	107	101	73	59	52	9	277
Oh‐Ryeong Ha United States	10	60 0.6×	67 0.7×	95 1.3×	110 1.9×	33 0.6×	16	279
Perilou Goddard United States	6	44 0.4×	56 0.6×	50 0.7×	28 0.5×	62 1.2×	9	314
Aukje Verhoeven Netherlands	9	96 0.9×	250 2.5×	171 2.3×	113 1.9×	89 1.7×	13	441
Nienke C. Jonker Netherlands	11	46 0.4×	81 0.8×	208 2.8×	35 0.6×	95 1.8×	27	285
Matthias Burkard Aulbach Finland	7	35 0.3×	77 0.8×	69 0.9×	52 0.9×	16 0.3×	23	195
Anja Kühnel Germany	9	69 0.6×	37 0.4×	71 1.0×	15 0.3×	122 2.3×	19	257
Ann Galizio United States	8	69 0.6×	85 0.8×	36 0.5×	14 0.2×	60 1.2×	17	264
Marjorie L. Prokosch United States	12	134 1.3×	68 0.7×	88 1.2×	45 0.8×	125 2.4×	23	401
Christina Ralph‐Nearman United States	12	67 0.6×	43 0.4×	314 4.3×	41 0.7×	190 3.7×	32	428
Jane F. Banfield Germany	6	111 1.0×	102 1.0×	66 0.9×	11 0.2×	103 2.0×	8	304

Countries citing papers authored by Maisy Best

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maisy Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maisy Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maisy Best more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maisy Best

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maisy Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maisy Best. The network helps show where Maisy Best may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maisy Best

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maisy Best. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maisy Best based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maisy Best. Maisy Best is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Papies, Esther K., et al.. (2021). Flavors of desire: Cognitive representations of appetitive stimuli and their motivational implications.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 151(8). 1919–1941. 15 indexed citations

2.

Best, Maisy, Ian P. L. McLaren, & Frederick Verbruggen. (2019). Instructed and Acquired Contingencies in Response-Inhibition Tasks. Journal of Cognition. 2(1). 4–4. 3 indexed citations

3.

Best, Maisy & Frederick Verbruggen. (2019). Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task?. Journal of Cognition. 2(1). 19–19. 3 indexed citations

4.

Best, Maisy & Esther K. Papies. (2019). Lower socioeconomic status is associated with higher intended consumption from oversized portions of unhealthy food. Appetite. 140. 255–268. 19 indexed citations

5.

Best, Maisy & Esther K. Papies. (2017). Right Here, Right Now: Situated Interventions to Change Consumer Habits. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. 2(3). 333–358. 28 indexed citations

6.

Elchlepp, Heike, Maisy Best, Aureliu Lavric, & Stephen Monsell. (2017). Shifting Attention Between Visual Dimensions as a Source of Switch Costs. Psychological Science. 28(4). 470–481. 14 indexed citations

7.

Papies, Esther K., et al.. (2017). The Role of Simulations in Consumer Experiences and Behavior: Insights from the Grounded Cognition Theory of Desire. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. 2(4). 402–418. 46 indexed citations

8.

Best, Maisy, Natalia Lawrence, Gordon D. Logan, Ian P. L. McLaren, & Frederick Verbruggen. (2015). Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 42(1). 115–137. 44 indexed citations

9.

Verbruggen, Frederick, et al.. (2014). The inhibitory control reflex. Neuropsychologia. 65. 263–278. 105 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact