Maike Isermann
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Co-authors
- Martin DiekmannJohannes KollmannAnnette OtteJ. ThieleChristian BergJürgen DenglerFlorian JansenTiemo Timmermann
- Topics
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (14 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers)Lichen and fungal ecology (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Maike Isermann
24 papers receiving 639 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Plant Science 350
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 295
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 292
- Ecology 255
- Ecological Modeling 97
Countries citing papers authored by Maike Isermann
This map shows the geographic impact of Maike Isermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maike Isermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maike Isermann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maike Isermann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maike Isermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maike Isermann. The network helps show where Maike Isermann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maike Isermann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maike Isermann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maike Isermann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maike Isermann. Maike Isermann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 62 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | Effects of Rosa rugosa invasion in different coastal dune vegetation types. | 13 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | Species richness in Sea-Buckthorn scrub | 2 |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | Wacholder auf den Ostfriesischen Inseln | 1 |
| 20 | 44 |
About Maike Isermann
Maike Isermann is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (292 citations), Ecological Modeling (97 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (295 citations). Maike Isermann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Martin Diekmann, Johannes Kollmann, Annette Otte, J. Thiele, Christian Berg, Jürgen Dengler, Florian Jansen, Tiemo Timmermann, Paul J. Rooney and Javier Loidi. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Ecology and Frontiers in Plant Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.