M. Vénere

28 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

M. Vénere
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Computational Mechanics 168
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 28
  • Radiation 38
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 52
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 74
Replace B. Aldefeld with:
B. Aldefeld Germany
C. Odet France
S.G. Azevedo United States
Johan Jansson Sweden
Yu Fang China
Rong He China
Shuangbao Shu China
Mariano Rivera Mexico
Johan Hoffman Sweden
Enzo A. Dari Argentina
M. Vénere relative to B. Aldefeld Germany B. Aldefeld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
B. Aldefeld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Vénere

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Vénere's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Vénere with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Vénere more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Vénere

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Vénere. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Vénere. The network helps show where M. Vénere may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Vénere, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Vénere Line = papers co-authored together M. Vénere links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005109
2 201286
3 200242
4 200941
5 200335
6 200034
7 201221
8 201317
9 200117
10 200012
11
Tomographic system based on Plasma Focus X-rays
20019
12 20238
13
An object oriented tool for automatic surface mesh generation using the advancing front technique
19976
14 20066
15 20106
16
A node placement method for 2 - d automatic mesh generation
19914
17 19954
18 20233
19 20242
20 20242

About M. Vénere

M. Vénere is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Mechanics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Aerospace Engineering and Radiation, having authored 29 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (6 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (5 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (3 papers), Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies (3 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (3 papers) and Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (168 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (28 citations), Radiation (38 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (52 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (74 citations). M. Vénere has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, Italy and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Alejandro Clausse, Raúl A. Feijóo, Santiago Urquiza, Pablo J. Blanco, Enzo A. Dari, Mariana del Fresno, Claudio Padra, J Heinrich, C. Moreno and D. R. Poirier. Their work appears in journals such as Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Hydrological Processes, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing and Computers in Biology and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact