Hydrological Processes

9.1k papers and 336.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.1k papers published in Hydrological Processes in the last decades have received a total of 336.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Hydrological Processes usually cover Water Science and Technology (5.3k papers), Global and Planetary Change (3.7k papers) and Environmental Engineering (2.5k papers) specifically the topics of Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (5.1k papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (1.6k papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (1.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hydrological Processes are Keith Beven, Andrew Binley, Günter Blöschl, K. Beven, Murugesu Sivapalan, John W. Pomeroy, Paul Bates, Jeffrey J. McDonnell, Vijay P. Singh and Rodger B. Grayson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Hydrological Processes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Hydrological Processes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hydrological Processes.

Countries where authors publish in Hydrological Processes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hydrological Processes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hydrological Processes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hydrological Processes more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025