M. Sipior
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Computational Mechanics
- Co-authors
- Simon Portegies ZwartJ. LeenaartsMark GielesH. J. G. L. M. LamersE. AthanassoulaHolger BaumgardtL. K. FulltonHoward E. Bond
- Topics
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers)Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (4 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (3 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astronomical Journal
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
M. Sipior
9 papers receiving 387 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 396
- Instrumentation 140
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 17
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 9
- Computational Mechanics 6
Countries citing papers authored by M. Sipior
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Sipior's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Sipior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Sipior more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Sipior
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Sipior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Sipior. The network helps show where M. Sipior may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Sipior
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Sipior. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Sipior based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Sipior. M. Sipior is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 172 | |
| 2 | Three-body encounters in the Galactic centre: the origin of the hypervelocity star SDSS J090745.0+024507 | 47 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Population synthesis and its connection to astronomical observables | 1 |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 130 | |
| 10 | 9 |
About M. Sipior
M. Sipior is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Demography, having authored 10 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (4 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (140 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (396 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (17 citations). M. Sipior has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Simon Portegies Zwart, J. Leenaarts, Mark Gieles, H. J. G. L. M. Lamers, E. Athanassoula, Holger Baumgardt, L. K. Fullton, Howard E. Bond, Robin Ciardullo and Alessia Gualandris. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astronomical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.