M. Sipior
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 3
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 4
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 4
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 3
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 3
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 3
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 2
- Astro and Planetary Science 2
- Co-authors
- Simon Portegies ZwartJ. LeenaartsMark GielesH. J. G. L. M. LamersE. AthanassoulaHolger BaumgardtL. K. FulltonHoward E. Bond
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (1 paper)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2 papers)The Astronomical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
M. Sipior
9 papers receiving 387 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Instrumentation 140
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 396
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 17
- Geophysics 5
- Spectroscopy 6
Countries citing papers authored by M. Sipior
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Sipior's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Sipior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Sipior more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Sipior
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Sipior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Sipior. The network helps show where M. Sipior may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside M. Sipior, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 172 | |
| 2 | Three-body encounters in the Galactic centre: the origin of the hypervelocity star SDSS J090745.0+024507 | 2005 | 47 |
| 3 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 6 | Population synthesis and its connection to astronomical observables | 2003 | 1 |
| 7 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 130 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 9 |
About M. Sipior
M. Sipior is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Demography, having authored 10 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (4 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (3 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (3 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (3 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (140 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (396 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (17 citations). M. Sipior has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Simon Portegies Zwart, J. Leenaarts, Mark Gieles, H. J. G. L. M. Lamers, E. Athanassoula, Holger Baumgardt, L. K. Fullton, Howard E. Bond, Robin Ciardullo and Alessia Gualandris. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astronomical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.