M. Seidel

86.7k citations
28 papers · 199 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

M. Seidel

25 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers

M. Seidel
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • History and Philosophy of Science 42
  • Philosophy 61
  • Family Practice 7
  • Applied Mathematics 18
  • Mathematical Physics 14
Replace Hans Niels Jahnke with:
Hans Niels Jahnke Germany
Giordano Bruno Italy
Carlo Cellucci Italy
Marco Panza France
John P. Mayberry United Kingdom
Karen Hunger Parshall United States
Hubert C. Kennedy United States
Ladislav Kvasz Czechia
Paul Τ. Keyser United States
Edward Elgar Netherlands
M. Seidel relative to Hans Niels Jahnke Germany Hans Niels Jahnke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Hans Niels Jahnke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Seidel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Seidel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Seidel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Seidel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Seidel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Seidel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Seidel. The network helps show where M. Seidel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Seidel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Seidel Line = papers co-authored together M. Seidel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200533
2 201421
3 200521
4 201417
5
Epistemic relativism : a constructive critique
201416
6 201113
7 200812
8 201211
9 202411
10 201210
11 20175
12 20164
13 20234
14 19964
15 20194
16 20122
17
The HERA p collimation system and first experience with a single collimator
19922
18 20122
19
Ludwik Fleck's Scientism
20151
20 20241

About M. Seidel

M. Seidel is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (3 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (2 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (42 citations), Philosophy (61 citations), Family Practice (7 citations), Applied Mathematics (18 citations) and Mathematical Physics (14 citations). M. Seidel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Christoph H. Loch, Bernd Silbermann, Z. D. Sharp, Andreas Pack, Eberhard Seidel, F. Guzmán, A. Lelek, A. Bermúdez Martínez, G. Lindstroem and I. Bubanja. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Informal Logic, Economic Geology, Metascience and Topoi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact