M. Scott Young

44 papers receiving 596 citations

Peers

M. Scott Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Biological Psychiatry 35
  • Clinical Psychology 266
  • General Health Professions 173
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 69
  • Safety Research 42
Replace Davina C. Ling with:
Davina C. Ling United States
Dominic Sisti United States
Susan Sierau Germany
Susan McPherson United Kingdom
Kerry Sudom Canada
Agnes Rupp United States
Megan O’Brien United States
Jana Ross United Kingdom
María Dolores Braquehais Spain
Gabriella Olsson Sweden
M. Scott Young relative to Davina C. Ling United States Davina C. Ling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Davina C. Ling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Scott Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Scott Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Scott Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Scott Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Scott Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Scott Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Scott Young. The network helps show where M. Scott Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Scott Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Scott Young Line = papers co-authored together M. Scott Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200147
2 200743
3 201739
4 201437
5 201233
6 200732
7 200631
8 200729
9 200727
10 201225
11 200624
12 200424
13 200824
14 201020
15 201217
16 201216
17 200914
18 201114
19 201913
20 199513

About M. Scott Young

M. Scott Young is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Epidemiology and Safety Research, having authored 47 papers that have together received 645 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Clinical Psychology (266 citations), General Health Professions (173 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (69 citations) and Safety Research (42 citations). M. Scott Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen A. Moore, Blake Barrett, John A. Schinka, Bill N. Kinder, Harris L. Friedman, Evgeny Krupitsky, Colleen Clark, Roger H. Peters, Karl Jansen and Richard A. Van Dorn. Their work appears in journals such as Community Mental Health Journal, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, Journal of Social Service Research and The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact