M. S. Philip
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Forestry top 1%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- H. C. DawkinsR. E. MalimbwiS.A.O. ChamshamaEric D. GalbraithAnthony I. CognatoAndrew J. StorerAaron D. SmithLawrence R. Kirkendall
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (3 papers)Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (2 papers)Forest Management and Policy (1 paper)
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and ManagementJournal of Tropical EcologyForestry An International Journal of Forest Research
- Partner nations
- United KingdomTanzaniaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
M. S. Philip
13 papers receiving 619 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 450
- Global and Planetary Change 259
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 140
- Forestry 132
- Ecology 117
Countries citing papers authored by M. S. Philip
This map shows the geographic impact of M. S. Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. S. Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. S. Philip more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. S. Philip
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. S. Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. S. Philip. The network helps show where M. S. Philip may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. S. Philip
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. S. Philip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. S. Philip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. S. Philip. M. S. Philip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 390 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | Management of tropical moist forests in Africa | 9 |
| 9 | Measuring trees and forests. A textbook written for students in Africa. | 11 |
| 10 | Thinning Pinus patula plantations at Sao Hill, Southern Tanzania. | 3 |
| 11 | 254 | |
| 12 | Working plan for the Budongo central forest reserve (including Budongo, Siba and Kitigo forests); thrid revision for the period 1st July 1964 to 30th June 1974. | 9 |
| 13 | Silvicultural research plan. Second revision, for the period 1964-1968 inclusive. | 1 |
| 14 | 3 |
About M. S. Philip
M. S. Philip is a scholar working on Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Endocrinology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 721 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (2 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (450 citations), Forestry (132 citations) and Horticulture (12 citations). M. S. Philip has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Tanzania and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include H. C. Dawkins, R. E. Malimbwi, S.A.O. Chamshama, Eric D. Galbraith, Anthony I. Cognato, Andrew J. Storer, Aaron D. Smith and Lawrence R. Kirkendall. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Tropical Ecology and Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.