M. S. J. Barson

682 total citations
8 papers, 477 citations indexed

About

M. S. J. Barson is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. S. J. Barson has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 477 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Materials Chemistry, 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 4 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in M. S. J. Barson's work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (8 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (4 papers). M. S. J. Barson is often cited by papers focused on Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (8 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (4 papers). M. S. J. Barson collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Japan and Germany. M. S. J. Barson's co-authors include Marcus W. Doherty, Neil B. Manson, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg, N. B. Manson, Andrey Jarmola, Dmitry Budker, Víctor M. Acosta, Takeshi Ohshima, Rose L. Ahlefeldt and Matthew J. Sellars and has published in prestigious journals such as Nano Letters, Physical Review B and New Journal of Physics.

In The Last Decade

M. S. J. Barson

8 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. S. J. Barson Australia	8	439	240	198	76	54	8	477
Julia Michl Germany	5	293 0.7×	185 0.8×	103 0.5×	67 0.9×	51 0.9×	6	335
Ernst David Herbschleb Japan	6	224 0.5×	160 0.7×	78 0.4×	61 0.8×	31 0.6×	9	291
Tobias Lühmann Germany	9	385 0.9×	139 0.6×	137 0.7×	99 1.3×	72 1.3×	20	422
Hannah Clevenson United States	8	324 0.7×	313 1.3×	133 0.7×	123 1.6×	11 0.2×	11	441
Christian Osterkamp Germany	12	332 0.8×	162 0.7×	108 0.5×	72 0.9×	76 1.4×	16	368
Karin Groot-Berning Germany	6	234 0.5×	151 0.6×	80 0.4×	69 0.9×	42 0.8×	8	314
Nicole Raatz Germany	9	291 0.7×	143 0.6×	98 0.5×	67 0.9×	56 1.0×	16	335
Jacob Henshaw United States	11	281 0.6×	128 0.5×	98 0.5×	103 1.4×	31 0.6×	18	333
Preeti Ovartchaiyapong United States	5	480 1.1×	556 2.3×	124 0.6×	167 2.2×	48 0.9×	9	705
Blake Regan Australia	10	282 0.6×	240 1.0×	34 0.2×	167 2.2×	34 0.6×	15	427

Countries citing papers authored by M. S. J. Barson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. S. J. Barson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. S. J. Barson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. S. J. Barson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. S. J. Barson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. S. J. Barson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. S. J. Barson. The network helps show where M. S. J. Barson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. S. J. Barson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. S. J. Barson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. S. J. Barson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. S. J. Barson. M. S. J. Barson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Barson, M. S. J., Liam P. McGuinness, Andrej Denisenko, et al.. (2021). Nanoscale Vector Electric Field Imaging Using a Single Electron Spin. Nano Letters. 21(7). 2962–2967. 32 indexed citations

2.

Broadway, David A., Brett C. Johnson, M. S. J. Barson, et al.. (2019). Microscopic Imaging of the Stress Tensor in Diamond Using in Situ Quantum Sensors. Nano Letters. 19(7). 4543–4550. 54 indexed citations

3.

Barson, M. S. J., Prithvi Reddy, Sen Yang, et al.. (2019). Temperature dependence of the C13 hyperfine structure of the negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. Physical review. B.. 99(9). 10 indexed citations

4.

Manson, Neil B., Morgan P. Hedges, M. S. J. Barson, et al.. (2018). NV⁻–N⁺ pair centre in 1b diamond. New Journal of Physics. 20(11). 113037–113037. 94 indexed citations

5.

Barson, M. S. J., Elmars Krausz, Neil B. Manson, & Marcus W. Doherty. (2018). The fine structure of the neutral nitrogen‐vacancy center in diamond. Nanophotonics. 8(11). 1985–1991. 26 indexed citations

6.

Barson, M. S. J., Preeti Ovartchaiyapong, Kumaravelu Ganesan, et al.. (2017). Nanomechanical Sensing Using Spins in Diamond. Nano Letters. 17(3). 1496–1503. 104 indexed citations

7.

Simpson, David, Amelia J. Thompson, Mark Kowarsky, et al.. (2014). In vivo imaging and tracking of individual nanodiamonds in drosophila melanogaster embryos. Biomedical Optics Express. 5(4). 1250–1250. 26 indexed citations

8.

Doherty, Marcus W., Víctor M. Acosta, Andrey Jarmola, et al.. (2014). Temperature shifts of the resonances of theNV−center in diamond. Physical Review B. 90(4). 131 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact