Ernst David Herbschleb
- Materials Chemistry
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Geophysics top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Norikazu MizuochiToshiharu MakinoSatoshi YamasakiHiromitsu KatoMasanori FujiwaraIzuru OhkiHiroki MorishitaYukie Maruyama
- Topics
- Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (5 papers)Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (5 papers)Quantum Information and Cryptography (2 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaApplied Physics Letters
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Ernst David Herbschleb
9 papers receiving 287 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Materials Chemistry 224
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 160
- Geophysics 78
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 61
- Artificial Intelligence 32
Countries citing papers authored by Ernst David Herbschleb
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernst David Herbschleb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernst David Herbschleb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst David Herbschleb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernst David Herbschleb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernst David Herbschleb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernst David Herbschleb. The network helps show where Ernst David Herbschleb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernst David Herbschleb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernst David Herbschleb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernst David Herbschleb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ernst David Herbschleb. Ernst David Herbschleb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 207 | |
| 9 | 19 |
About Ernst David Herbschleb
Ernst David Herbschleb is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Geophysics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (5 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (5 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (78 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (160 citations) and Materials Chemistry (224 citations). Ernst David Herbschleb has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Norikazu Mizuochi, Toshiharu Makino, Satoshi Yamasaki, Hiromitsu Kato, Masanori Fujiwara, Izuru Ohki, Hiroki Morishita, Yukie Maruyama, Kazushi Hayashi and Aya Watanabe. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Applied Physics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.