M. Robert Peters

761 total citations
20 papers, 526 citations indexed

About

M. Robert Peters is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Robert Peters has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 526 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 5 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in M. Robert Peters's work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (5 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers). M. Robert Peters is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (5 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers). M. Robert Peters collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. M. Robert Peters's co-authors include Andrew J. Einstein, Peter F. Wright, F W Robinson, Barney S. Graham, Yuwei Zhu, William C. Gruber, George Reed, Eric J. Topol, Paddy Barrett and Nathan E. Wineinger and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Infectious Diseases and The American Journal of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

M. Robert Peters

18 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Robert Peters United States 13 206 166 137 136 134 20 526
H. McCann Ireland 10 129 0.6× 59 0.4× 87 0.6× 30 0.2× 140 1.0× 21 502
Jason N. Johnson United States 13 268 1.3× 151 0.9× 307 2.2× 151 1.1× 147 1.1× 42 566
Christopher Z. Lam Canada 11 99 0.5× 41 0.2× 168 1.2× 77 0.6× 157 1.2× 59 381
Shilpi Epstein United States 9 34 0.2× 122 0.7× 62 0.5× 114 0.8× 290 2.2× 13 424
Devesh Rai United States 12 31 0.2× 42 0.3× 83 0.6× 61 0.4× 84 0.6× 75 404
Bhavya Rehani United States 12 110 0.5× 29 0.2× 50 0.4× 66 0.5× 89 0.7× 30 397
Morgan L. Cox United States 14 25 0.1× 48 0.3× 81 0.6× 196 1.4× 289 2.2× 43 528
Rajan Agarwal United States 12 154 0.7× 23 0.1× 98 0.7× 27 0.2× 88 0.7× 15 469
Juan Farina United States 11 70 0.3× 22 0.1× 100 0.7× 54 0.4× 114 0.9× 119 483
Bos E Netherlands 14 91 0.4× 40 0.2× 255 1.9× 156 1.1× 333 2.5× 43 571

Countries citing papers authored by M. Robert Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Robert Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Robert Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Robert Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Robert Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Robert Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Robert Peters. The network helps show where M. Robert Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Robert Peters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Robert Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Robert Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Robert Peters. M. Robert Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hung, Pam, M. Robert Peters, Christine Guptill, et al.. (2025). Considerations for engaging in patient-oriented research with injured workers. Frontiers in Health Services. 5. 1589643–1589643.
3.
5.
Lowenstein, Margaret, Maya Vijayaraghavan, Nancy J. Burke, et al.. (2019). Real-world lung cancer screening decision-making: Barriers and facilitators. Lung Cancer. 133. 32–37. 31 indexed citations
6.
Muse, Evan D., Nathan E. Wineinger, Emily Spencer, et al.. (2018). Validation of a genetic risk score for atrial fibrillation: A prospective multicenter cohort study. PLoS Medicine. 15(3). e1002525–e1002525. 23 indexed citations
7.
Trattner, Sigal, Sandra S. Halliburton, Yanping Xu, et al.. (2017). Cardiac-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Radiation Effective Dose From Dose-Length Product in Computed Tomography. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 11(1). 64–74. 108 indexed citations
8.
Bloss, Cinnamon S., Nathan E. Wineinger, M. Robert Peters, et al.. (2016). A prospective randomized trial examining health care utilization in individuals using multiple smartphone-enabled biosensors. PeerJ. 4. e1554–e1554. 68 indexed citations
9.
Peters, M. Robert, Gregor Krings, Matthew J. Koster, et al.. (2014). Effective radiation dosage of three-dimensional rotational angiography in children. EP Europace. 17(4). 611–616. 22 indexed citations
10.
Einstein, Andrew J., Carl D. Elliston, Daniel W. Groves, et al.. (2011). Effect of bismuth breast shielding on radiation dose and image quality in coronary CT angiography. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 19(1). 100–108. 36 indexed citations
11.
Uretsky, Seth, Alan Rozanski, Azhar Supariwala, et al.. (2011). Physiological correlates of densely calcified coronary lesions on coronary computed tomography angiography among patients with low-to-intermediate coronary artery disease likelihood. Coronary Artery Disease. 22(7). 463–467. 1 indexed citations
13.
Uretsky, Seth, Alan Rozanski, Azhar Supariwala, et al.. (2011). Clinical outcomes following a strategy of optimized medical management and selective “downstream” procedures following coronary computed tomography angiography. International Journal of Cardiology. 165(3). 468–473. 11 indexed citations
14.
Uretsky, Seth, Alan Rozanski, Azhar Supariwala, et al.. (2010). The presence, characterization and prognosis of coronary plaques among patients with zero coronary calcium scores. International journal of cardiac imaging. 27(6). 805–812. 23 indexed citations
15.
Nativí, Jose, Abdallah G. Kfoury, M. Robert Peters, et al.. (2009). Effects of the 2006 U.S. thoracic organ allocation change: Analysis of local impact on organ procurement and heart transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 29(3). 235–239. 31 indexed citations
16.
Einstein, Andrew J., Steven Wolff, Eric Manheimer, et al.. (2009). Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Between Conventional Helical Scanning and a Strategy Incorporating Sequential Scanning. The American Journal of Cardiology. 104(10). 1343–1350. 13 indexed citations
17.
Makaryus, Amgad N. & M. Robert Peters. (2008). Congenital left ventricular diverticulum diagnosed by 64-detector CT imaging.. PubMed. 20(7). 372–3. 1 indexed citations
18.
Wright, Peter F., William C. Gruber, M. Robert Peters, et al.. (2002). Illness Severity, Viral Shedding, and Antibody Responses in Infants Hospitalized with Bronchiolitis Caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 185(8). 1011–1018. 99 indexed citations
19.
Lowell, Jeffrey A., Craig R. Smith, Daniel C. Brennan, et al.. (2000). THE DOMINO TRANSPLANT: TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS AS ORGAN DONORS1. Transplantation. 69(3). 372–376. 17 indexed citations
20.
Lowell, Jeffrey A., Silvia Taranto, Gad Singer, et al.. (1997). Transplant recipients as organ donors: The domino transplant. Transplantation Proceedings. 29(8). 3392–3393. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026