M. O. Scase
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Oliver BraddickJane E. RaymondDavid FosterLee HadlingtonJ. H. B. ScarpelloKevin HardyJeffrey H. LiptonEhud Zohary
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers)Color Science and Applications (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustriaQatar
In The Last Decade
M. O. Scase
23 papers receiving 433 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Cognitive Neuroscience 217
- Ophthalmology 131
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 62
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 52
- Molecular Biology 51
Countries citing papers authored by M. O. Scase
This map shows the geographic impact of M. O. Scase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. O. Scase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. O. Scase more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. O. Scase
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. O. Scase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. O. Scase. The network helps show where M. O. Scase may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. O. Scase
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. O. Scase. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. O. Scase based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. O. Scase. M. O. Scase is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | A review of evidence to evaluate effectiveness of intervention strategies to address inequalities in eye health care | 4 |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | Brain activation by random dot kinematograms of varying motion coherence: a fMRI study | 5 |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 127 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | SPATIAL INCOHERENCE INCREASES VISIBLE PERSISTENCE OF MOVING DOTS | 4 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 86 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | TEMPORALLY DEPENDENT HUE DISCRIMINATION IN NORMAL AND IMPAIRED HUMAN-VISION | 1 |
| 20 | 20 |
About M. O. Scase
M. O. Scase is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Color Science and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (131 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (217 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (52 citations). M. O. Scase has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Oliver Braddick, Jane E. Raymond, David Foster, Lee Hadlington, J. H. B. Scarpello, Kevin Hardy, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Ehud Zohary, James Heron and Rosemary Snelgar. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Vision Research and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.