M. López

3.0k total citations
9 papers, 247 citations indexed

About

M. López is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. López has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 247 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5 papers in Instrumentation and 4 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in M. López's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers) and Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (4 papers). M. López is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers) and Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (4 papers). M. López collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Belgium and Netherlands. M. López's co-authors include L. M. Sarro, J. Debosscher, C. Aerts, Jonas Blomme, L. Rimoldini, P. Dubath, J. De Ridder, R. Guzmán, T. Lebzelter and M. Beck and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

In The Last Decade

M. López

9 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. López Spain	7	203	84	67	31	21	9	247
Arien Crellin-Quick United States	4	145 0.7×	54 0.6×	46 0.7×	31 1.0×	23 1.1×	4	203
Maxime Rischard United States	5	125 0.6×	57 0.7×	48 0.7×	31 1.0×	14 0.7×	5	207
D. Starr United States	7	394 1.9×	116 1.4×	50 0.7×	32 1.0×	53 2.5×	15	451
Markos Trichas United Kingdom	5	210 1.0×	75 0.9×	30 0.4×	9 0.3×	23 1.1×	9	251
Xiao Kong China	12	198 1.0×	126 1.5×	58 0.9×	7 0.2×	9 0.4×	30	276
G. Riccio Italy	7	106 0.5×	39 0.5×	19 0.3×	12 0.4×	14 0.7×	18	160
R. L. Pennington United States	5	126 0.6×	61 0.7×	46 0.7×	24 0.8×	19 0.9×	10	206
T. Boch France	6	120 0.6×	33 0.4×	34 0.5×	12 0.4×	56 2.7×	25	160
Daniel Muthukrishna United States	9	162 0.8×	42 0.5×	28 0.4×	9 0.3×	59 2.8×	10	198
L. Faccioli France	9	175 0.9×	88 1.0×	13 0.2×	29 0.9×	33 1.6×	22	229

Countries citing papers authored by M. López

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. López's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. López with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. López more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. López

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. López. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. López. The network helps show where M. López may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. López

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. López. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. López based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. López. M. López is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Rimoldini, L., P. Dubath, M. Süveges, et al.. (2012). Automated classification of Hipparcos unsolved variables. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 427(4). 2917–2937. 26 indexed citations

2.

Blomme, Jonas, L. M. Sarro, Francis T. O’Donovan, et al.. (2011). Improved methodology for the automated classification of periodic variable stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 418(1). 96–106. 22 indexed citations

3.

Dubath, P., L. Rimoldini, M. Süveges, et al.. (2011). Searching for Periodic Variables in the EROS-2 Database. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 7(S285). 309–311. 1 indexed citations

4.

Dubath, P., L. Rimoldini, M. Süveges, et al.. (2011). Random forest automated supervised classification of Hipparcos periodic variable stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 414(3). 2602–2617. 96 indexed citations

5.

Sarro, L. M., J. Debosscher, C. Aerts, & M. López. (2009). Comparative clustering analysis of variable stars in the Hipparcos, OGLE Large Magellanic Cloud, and CoRoT exoplanet databases. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 17 indexed citations

6.

Sarro, L. M., J. Debosscher, M. López, & C. Aerts. (2008). Automated supervised classification of variable stars. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 494(2). 739–768. 21 indexed citations

7.

Sarro, L. M., J. Debosscher, M. López, & C. Aerts. (2008). Automated supervised classification of variable stars II. Application to the OGLE database. Lirias (KU Leuven). 21 indexed citations

8.

Guzmán, R., et al.. (2005). Towards a precision cosmology from starburst galaxies atz> 2. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 356(3). 1117–1122. 42 indexed citations

9.

López, M., et al.. (1969). Radiation plan for the Apollo lunar mission. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact