M. Lopes‐Cardozo
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- S.G. van den BerghL.M.G. Van GoldeB. ColenbranderB.M. GadellaTheodorus W. J. GadellaW. R. KleinGerrit van MeerP van der Bijl
- Topics
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (7 papers)Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers)Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
M. Lopes‐Cardozo
22 papers receiving 595 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Molecular Biology 301
- Physiology 179
- Reproductive Medicine 167
- Clinical Biochemistry 118
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 117
Countries citing papers authored by M. Lopes‐Cardozo
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Lopes‐Cardozo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Lopes‐Cardozo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Lopes‐Cardozo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Lopes‐Cardozo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Lopes‐Cardozo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Lopes‐Cardozo. The network helps show where M. Lopes‐Cardozo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Lopes‐Cardozo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Lopes‐Cardozo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Lopes‐Cardozo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Lopes‐Cardozo. M. Lopes‐Cardozo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 52 | |
| 3 | 94 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | Development of oligodendrocytes. Studies of rat glial cells cultured in chemically-defined medium. | 11 |
| 10 | 50 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About M. Lopes‐Cardozo
M. Lopes‐Cardozo is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Developmental Neuroscience and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (7 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (167 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (118 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (39 citations). M. Lopes‐Cardozo has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include S.G. van den Bergh, L.M.G. Van Golde, B. Colenbrander, B.M. Gadella, Theodorus W. J. Gadella, W. R. Klein, Gerrit van Meer, P van der Bijl, Jan W. Koper and W.J. Vaartjes. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Journal of Cell Science and FEBS Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.